IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/jessjo/v2y2018i1p82-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigations Regarding the Opinions of Researchers from the Scientific Research System of Romanian Academy upon the Results Periodically Reported

Author

Listed:
  • Meda V GÂLEA

    (Al. I. Cuza University of Iasi, Doctoral School of Economics and Business Administration)

Abstract

The present paper aims to introduce several considerations regarding the shape, content and importance of the results obtained from the scientific research activity in the Romanian Academy as they are appreciated by the specialized personnel within the system. The study commences from the observations which adhere to the uniformity of the introduction manner of the research results across the entire national system of research-development from the international regulatory laws and the observations related to the different structure of results monitored and reported by the Romanian Academy. A proper management of the results obtained from the scientific research activity contributes, among others, to the assessment of the activities run by researches on personal level and further more to those run on institutional and national level. The results are elements of support for the analysis mode in which the system operates and they provide the basis of the next financing distribution. Thus, we regard as significant the special stress put on adjusting the manner of results presentation to the internationally agreed manner, in pusuit of visibility, competitiveness, comparability and increasing impact of the final outcomes upon the economic and social environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Meda V GÂLEA, 2018. "Investigations Regarding the Opinions of Researchers from the Scientific Research System of Romanian Academy upon the Results Periodically Reported," Journal for Ethics in Social Studies, Editura Lumen, vol. 2(1), pages 82-104, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:jessjo:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:82-104
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/jess/11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/jess/article/view/592
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/jess/11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fedderke, J.W. & Goldschmidt, M., 2015. "Does massive funding support of researchers work?: Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 467-482.
    2. Geisler, E., 1995. "An integrated cost-performance model of research and development evaluation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 281-294, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duk Hee Lee & Il Won Seo & Ho Chull Choe & Hee Dae Kim, 2012. "Collaboration network patterns and research performance: the case of Korean public research institutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 925-942, June.
    2. Dziallas, Marisa & Blind, Knut, 2019. "Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 3-29.
    3. Aboal, Diego & Tacsir, Ezequiel, 2016. "The impact of ex-ante subsidies to researchers on researcher's productivity: Evidence from a developing country," MERIT Working Papers 2016-019, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Unsal, Omer & Houston, Reza, 2024. "R&D grants and medical innovation," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Mehdi Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2020. "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 53-99, October.
    6. Hashimoto, Akihiro & Haneda, Shoko, 2008. "Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1829-1836, December.
    7. Wen-Cheng Lu & Ting-Kun Liu, 2010. "Malmquist Indices Of R&D Productivity Growth In Taiwanese Ic-Design Industry," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(1), pages 105-114.
    8. Zhang, Gupeng & Zhou, Jianghua, 2016. "The effects of forward and reverse engineering on firm innovation performance in the stages of technology catch-up: An empirical study of China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 212-222.
    9. Yuret, Tolga, 2017. "Do researchers pay attention to publication subsidies?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 423-434.
    10. Chou, Ying-Chyi & Hsu, Ying-Ying & Yen, Hsin-Yi, 2008. "Human resources for science and technology: Analyzing competitiveness using the analytic hierarchy process," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 141-153.
    11. Amara, Nabil & Rhaiem, Mehdi & Halilem, Norrin, 2020. "Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 296-306.
    12. Guan, Jiancheng & Chen, Kaihua, 2012. "Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 102-115.
    13. Yang, Jinyu & Zhang, Wenqing & Zhao, Xiande, 2024. "How can suppliers strategically involve downstream manufacturers in research and development collaboration? A knowledge spillover perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 122-135.
    14. Jiancheng Guan & Kairui Zuo, 2014. "A cross-country comparison of innovation efficiency," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(2), pages 541-575, August.
    15. Jianping Li & Yongjia Xie & Dengsheng Wu & Yuanping Chen, 2017. "Underestimating or overestimating the distribution inequality of research funding? The influence of funding sources and subdivision," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 55-74, July.
    16. Yin, Zhifeng & Liang, Zheng & Zhi, Qiang, 2018. "Does the concentration of scientific research funding in institutions promote knowledge output?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1146-1159.
    17. Kübra Gürbüz & Erkan Erdil, 2021. "Prioritization and R&D Support Mechanisms: Turkish Case," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 962-991, June.
    18. Wang, Lili & Wang, Xianwen & Piro, Fredrik Niclas & Philipsen, Niels, 2019. "The effect of public funding on scientific performance: A comparison between China and the EU," MERIT Working Papers 2019-045, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    19. Peretz, Jean H. & Das, Sujit & Tonn, Bruce E., 2009. "Evaluating knowledge benefits of automotive lightweighting materials R&D projects," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 300-309, August.
    20. Koichiro ONISHI & Hideo OWAN, 2020. "Heterogenous Impacts of National Research Grants on Academic Productivity," Discussion papers 20052, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Romanian Academy; scientific research; management; scientific results;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:jessjo:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:82-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/jess/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.