IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/ejlpa1/v5y2018i1p126-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Court Debates As Interactive Teaching Method In Training Judges

Author

Listed:
  • Oleksii CHERNOVSKYI

    (Chernivtsi National University named after Y. Fedkovych)

Abstract

At the present stage, taking into account European experience, the role of reforming judiciary education in Ukraine, which should include not only knowledge of material and procedural law, but also is obliged to help judges, to understand the social context of cases which they consider, to predict the consequences of their decisions for an individual and for society as a whole. It is consiered that the replacement of traditional academic teaching methods in the form of lectures on modern interactive teaching methods, among which the court debates play an important role, contributing to the understanding of legal thinking as a living interpersonal communication, a complexsocial system based on mutual communication between the parties in the stage of judicial review. The narrativity of the debate, as an interactive teaching method in the process of training judges, is a component of practical experience which, on the one hand, embraces knowledge, abilities, skills and instruction, and on the other hand stands as discursive and intersubjective method, it needs constant, legal communication, characterized by readiness to hear others and to increase own professional qualification level.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleksii CHERNOVSKYI, 2018. "Court Debates As Interactive Teaching Method In Training Judges," European Journal of Law and Public Administration, Editura LUMEN, vol. 5(1), pages 126-135, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:5:y:2018:i:1:p:126-135
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/ejlpa/article/view/873/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/33?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    debates; interactive teaching methods; judge education; communication; experience.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:5:y:2018:i:1:p:126-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.