IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/ejlpa1/v4y2017i1p41-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretation Of The Legal Norm. Applications Of The Principle Ubi Lex Non Distinguit, Nec Nos Distinguere Debemus

Author

Listed:
  • Camelia IGNATESCU

    (Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava)

Abstract

The connection of casual reality to legal norm is complex and any legal solution implies a particular reasoning. The interpretation of law involves a legal methodology capable of providing specific methods of interpretation, with its own rules. One of the rules of logical interpretation is expressed by the principle "ubi lex non distinguit, nec nos distinguere debemus", ie "where the law does not distinguish, nor the interpreter must distinguish" or, in other words, the generality of the formulation of a legal text leads to generality of its application, without being able to make distinctions to which that text does not refer.

Suggested Citation

  • Camelia IGNATESCU, 2017. "Interpretation Of The Legal Norm. Applications Of The Principle Ubi Lex Non Distinguit, Nec Nos Distinguere Debemus," European Journal of Law and Public Administration, Editura LUMEN, vol. 4(2), pages 41-49, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:4:y:2017:i:1:p:41-49
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/ejlpa/article/view/392/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/12?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Iuliana LAMASANU, 2017. "Consideration Regarding Harassment Offence," European Journal of Law and Public Administration, Editura LUMEN, vol. 4(2), pages 50-57, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:4:y:2017:i:1:p:41-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.