IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/ejlpa1/v3y2016i1p37-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contemporary Benchmarks Of The Interference Of Law With Religion And Ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Elena IFTIME

    (Professor, PhD, ,,Stefan cel Mare” University, Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

The present article provides an opportunity for reflection and debate about the connections of juridicity with religiosity and morality, social-human components founded on social rules with the same specific. We particularly insist on how the law, as coordinator of human behaviour divides this effort and concern with religion and ethics. That is why, with all its autonomy and peculiarity, any system of law, no matter the space and time is deeply marked by the ethics and religion of the social-human environment where it works. This is because the social mission of the three component standards respond to a constant need for social and human balance, order and limit in everything, care and love for people, all translated in the social and human welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena IFTIME, 2016. "Contemporary Benchmarks Of The Interference Of Law With Religion And Ethics," European Journal of Law and Public Administration, Editura LUMEN, vol. 3(1), pages 37-46, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:3:y:2016:i:1:p:37-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.usv.ro/index.php/en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Juridicity; morality; religiosity; social rule; justice; equity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • K30 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - General
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:3:y:2016:i:1:p:37-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.