IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lrc/larijb/v3y2013i7p28-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The International Accounting Standards Board’s Progress in Promoting Judgement Through Objectives-Oriented Accounting Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Tanja Lakovic

    (Teaching Assistant, Faculty of Economics, University of Montenegro)

  • Jayne Fuglister

    (Fulbright Professor, September – December, 2012, Faculty of Economics, University of Montenegro)

Abstract

This study analyzes how the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) promotes professional judgement by issuing objectives-oriented accounting standards and exposure drafts. We focus on the the role of judgement as outlined in Phase I of the IASB Conceptual Framework (CF), Chapter 1, “Objective of General Purpose Financial Statements†and Chapter 3, “Qualitative Characteristics of Useful Financial Information†(IASB 2010). We discuss how the framework, when viewed through the prism of 'objectives-oriented accounting standards' as recommended by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Report in its “Study Pursuant to Section 108(d) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on the Adoption by the United States Financial Reporting System of a Principles-Based Accounting System†(July 2003), encourages professional judgement. We analyze International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Exposure Drafts (ED) issued by the IASB since its inception in 2002 to determine if those documents are consistent with objectives-oriented accounting standards. Our analysis is useful for gaining insights into how the IASB integrates the CF with the SEC’s recommended objectives-oriented accounting approach to promote judgement in the interest of IASB/FASB convergence of accounting standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanja Lakovic & Jayne Fuglister, 2013. "The International Accounting Standards Board’s Progress in Promoting Judgement Through Objectives-Oriented Accounting Standards," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 3(7), pages 28-42, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:lrc:larijb:v:3:y:2013:i:7:p:28-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://thejournalofbusiness.org/index.php/site/article/view/244/241
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce Bennett & Michael Bradbury & Helen Prangnell, 2006. "Rules, principles and judgments in accounting standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 42(2), pages 189-204, June.
    2. Jim Psaros & Ken T. Trotman, 2004. "The Impact of the Type of Accounting Standards on Preparers’ Judgments," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 40(1), pages 76-93, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alain Burlaud & Maria Niculescu, 2016. "Accounting standards that appeal to the professional judgment: a threat or an opportunity for the accounting profession [Un drept contabil care face appel la raţionamentul profesional: o ameninţare," Post-Print halshs-02145487, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guilherme Belloque & Martina K Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K Singh & Rui Xue, 2021. "55 years of Abacus: Evolution of Research Streams and Future Research Directions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 593-618, September.
    2. Braun, Gary P. & Haynes, Christine M. & Lewis, Tom D. & Taylor, Mark H., 2015. "Principles-based vs. rules-based accounting standards: The effects of auditee proposed accounting treatment and regulatory enforcement on auditor judgments and confidence," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 45-50.
    3. Tanja Lakovic & Jayne Fuglister, 2013. "The International Accounting Standards Board’s Progress in Promoting Judgement Through Objectives-Oriented Accounting Standards," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(7), pages 28-42, July.
    4. Peipei Pan & Chris Patel, 2018. "The Influence of Native Versus Foreign Language on Chinese Subjects’ Aggressive Financial Reporting Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 863-878, July.
    5. Peter Carey & Brad Potter & George Tanewski, 2014. "Application of the Reporting Entity Concept in Australia," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 50(4), pages 460-489, December.
    6. Khushbu Agrawal & Chanchal Chatterjee, 2015. "Earnings Management and Financial Distress: Evidence from India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(5_suppl), pages 140-154, October.
    7. Anna-Maija Lantto, 2014. "Business Involvement in Accounting: A Case Study of International Financial Reporting Standards Adoption and the Work of Accountants," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 335-356, June.
    8. Hodges, Ron & Mellett, Howard, 2012. "The U.K. private finance initiative: An accounting retrospective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 235-247.
    9. Hazianti Abdul Halim & Hartini Jaafar & Sharul Effendy Janudin, 2018. "Factors Influencing Professional Judgment of Auditors in Malaysia," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(11), pages 119-127, November.
    10. Dennis, Ian, 2008. "A conceptual enquiry into the concept of a ‘principles-based’ accounting standard," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 260-271.
    11. Bradbury, Michael E. & Schröder, Laura B., 2012. "The content of accounting standards: Principles versus rules," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-10.
    12. Amitav Saha & Sudipta Bose, 2021. "Do IFRS disclosure requirements reduce the cost of capital? Evidence from Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4669-4701, September.
    13. Anna Bedford & Martin Bugeja & Nelson Ma, 2022. "The impact of IFRS 10 on consolidated financial reporting," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 101-141, March.
    14. Teng Zhou & Jacqueline Birt & Michaela Rankin, 2015. "The value relevance of exploration and evaluation expenditures," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3), pages 228-250, November.
    15. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Joerg‐Markus Hitz & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2009. "Relevance of Academic Research and Researchers' Role in the IASB's Financial Reporting Standard Setting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(4), pages 455-492, December.
    16. Anna Samsonova-Taddei, 2013. "Social Relations and the Differential Local Impact of Global Standards: The Case of International Standards on Auditing," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(4), pages 506-538, December.
    17. Roberto Carlos Klann & Ilse Maria Beuren, 2018. "Earnings management IFRS adoption in Brazilian and British companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(1), pages 13-28, February.
    18. Michael E. Bradbury & Tom Scott, 2021. "What accounting standards were the cause of enforcement actions following IFRS adoption?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2247-2268, April.
    19. Kohler, Hervé & Pochet, Christine & Le Manh, Anne, 2021. "Auditors as intermediaries in the endogenization of an accounting standard: The case of IFRS 15 within the telecom industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    20. Mark Penno, 2022. "Concepts‐based Accounting Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(2), pages 209-232, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lrc:larijb:v:3:y:2013:i:7:p:28-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al Hossain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.thejournalofbusiness.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.