Author
Listed:
- Agus Setio Widodo
(Doctoral Program of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.)
- Sri Suwitri
(Doctoral Program of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.)
- Hardi Warsono
(Doctoral Program of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.)
- Suharyanto
(Doctoral Program of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.)
Abstract
As introduction can be said that the initial assumption estimates the number of people affected by eruption of Mount Slamet in hazardous area are 215,953 people (BPBD Central Java, 2016). Unfortunately, there is a general tendency where people do not know how to act or respond to disasters.This research is urgent to discover the main determinant that can be used to make emergency response policies and build disaster reduction networks. In this framework the authors formulate several important issues, How to create a model of disaster reduction networks in disaster-prone areas (KRB) of Mount Slamet? Qualitative approach is used as methodology to answer research questions for understanding and describe a comprehensive and complete picture and the detail in case of disaster risk reduction. Theoretically, McEntire, David A and Gregg Dawson (2010) once said that disaster management requires the integration of policies, programs and execution involving many individuals and groups. The result of this study are; fisrt, disaster risk cannot be solved by the government itself, but requires synergic cooperation from government, private and community elements. Second, participative model (networks) has made in disaster risk reduction networks in disaster-prone areas (KRB) of Mount Slamet. Discussion about the result product the recommendations: 1) It is required to allocate more unexpected funds for overcoming disaster. 2) It is required for regular coordination to update the contingency plan documents in accordance with the progress including updating the data on the availability of resources.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lrc:larijb:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:13-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al Hossain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.thejournalofbusiness.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.