IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lap/recadm/176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Epistemic Opacity And Epistemic Transparency. Organizations That Produce, Support And Recreate Them In Platform Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Matías Herrera

    (Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina)

  • Ana Inés Heras

    (Laboratorio Investigaciones Ciencias Humanas, Escuela Humanidades, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, Argentina Instituto para la Inclusión Social y el Desarrollo Humano, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina)

Abstract

Technological changes in recent years have allowed the emergence, consolidation and -in some cases- dominance of platform businesses. The growth of this type of companies has been very fast since the mid-nineties, fostered by technological transformations and digital connection. However, not all uses of internet platforms are performed by companies, nor all companies have a capitalist organization. There are social-in-solidarity digital developments and platforms, based on open source, shared space, non-profit exchange, and a permanent work of socializing of what is being generated as knowledge.In this paper, we first present a literature review of the field we call Platform Economy, to position the concept of epistemic opacity and explain the power of domination built by this mode. We will discuss the differences between two positions. One, which we call commercial platforms for profit with epistemic opacity and social domination, and another, which we call epistemic transparency as they are free and open access public spaces to produce and share the capital stock jointly and severally.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Matías Herrera & Ana Inés Heras, 2023. "Epistemic Opacity And Epistemic Transparency. Organizations That Produce, Support And Recreate Them In Platform Economies," Revista Ciencias Administrativas (CADM), IIA, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Instituto de Investigaciones Administrativas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, issue 22, pages 1-10, July-Dece.
    • Handle: RePEc:lap:recadm:176
    DOI: 10.24215/23143738e118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/CADM/article/view/13824
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24215/23143738e118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantiou, Ioanna D & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2015. "New games, new rules: big data and the changing context of strategy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63017, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Hal R Varian, 2014. "Beyond Big Data," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 27-31, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Castell, Carolin & Kiefer, Jasmin & Schubach, Sebastian & Schumann, Jan H. & Graf-Vlachy, Lorenz & König, Andreas, 2023. "Integrating digital platform dynamics into customer orientation research: A systematic review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Steffen, Nico & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Kroon, Peter, 2021. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung in der Plattform- und Datenökonomie," WIK Discussion Papers 481, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    3. Gangopadhyay, Partha & Jain, Siddharth & Bakry, Walid, 2022. "In search of a rational foundation for the massive IT boom in the Australian banking industry: Can the IT boom really drive relationship banking?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Erdsiek, Daniel & Rost, Vincent, 2022. "Datenbewirtschaftung in deutschen Unternehmen: Umfrageergebnisse zu Status-quo und mittelfristigem Ausblick," ZEW Expert Briefs 22-09, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Seddon, Jonathan J.J.M. & Currie, Wendy L., 2017. "A model for unpacking big data analytics in high-frequency trading," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 300-307.
    6. Mohd Syaiful Rizal Abd Hamid & Nor Ratna Masrom & Nur Athirah Binti Mazlan, 2022. "The Key Factors of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 in the Malaysian Smart Manufacturing Context," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Hannes Rothe & Katharina Barbara Lauer & Callum Talbot-Cooper & Daniel Juan Sivizaca Conde, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurship from cellular data: How omics afford the emergence of a new wave of digital ventures in health," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Onorante, Luca & Raftery, Adrian E., 2016. "Dynamic model averaging in large model spaces using dynamic Occam׳s window," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 2-14.
    9. Marcel Rolf Pfeifer, 2021. "Human Resources during COVID-19: A Monthly Survey on Mental Health and Working Attitudes of Czech Employees and Managers during the Year 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Christoph Keding, 2021. "Understanding the interplay of artificial intelligence and strategic management: four decades of research in review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 91-134, February.
    11. Jean-Luc Pradel Mathurin Augustin & Shu-Yi Liaw, 2020. "Exploring the Relationship between Perceived Big Data Advantages and Online Consumers’ Behavior: An Extended Hierarchy of Effects Model," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 1-73, June.
    12. Mucha, Tomasz & Seppälä, Timo, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence Platforms – A New Research Agenda for Digital Platform Economy," ETLA Working Papers 76, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    13. Giorgi Shuradze & Yevgen Bogodistov & Heinz-Theo Wagner, 2018. "The Role Of Marketing-Enabled Data Analytics Capability And Organisational Agility For Innovation: Empirical Evidence From German Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-32, May.
    14. Power, Michael, 2022. "Theorizing the economy of traces: from audit society to surveillance capitalism," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112167, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Michela Chessa & Patrick Loiseau, 2017. "Enhancing Voluntary Contribution in a Public Goods Economy via a Minimum Individual Contribution Level," GREDEG Working Papers 2017-24, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France, revised Feb 2023.
    16. Keding, Christoph & Meissner, Philip, 2021. "Managerial overreliance on AI-augmented decision-making processes: How the use of AI-based advisory systems shapes choice behavior in R&D investment decisions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Gil, Olga, 2022. "Accountability in Artificial Intelligence," SocArXiv wckuf_v1, Center for Open Science.
    18. Oliver Falck & Johannes Koenen, 2020. "Resource “Data”: Economic Benefits of Data Provision," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 21(03), pages 31-41, September.
    19. Xue, Fujing & Li, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Ting & Hu, Nan, 2021. "Stock market reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic: The moderating role of corporate big data strategies based on Word2Vec," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    20. Ekene Okwechime & Peter Duncan & David Edgar, 2018. "Big data and smart cities: a public sector organizational learning perspective," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 601-625, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    platform economy; digital platforms; epistemic opacity; epistemic sharpness;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lap:recadm:176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Clara Calabria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aunlpar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.