IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/2190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lokális ágazatközi kapcsolatok - hibrid ÁKM Pécs városrégióban
[Local intersectoral linkages: hybrid input-output tables in the Pécs City Region]

Author

Listed:
  • Szabó, Norbert
  • Bilicz, Hanga Lilla

Abstract

A területi szintű ágazati kapcsolatok mérlegei (ÁKM) egyre nagyobb szerepet töltenek be a különféle, akár szakpolitikai intézkedéseket is támogató gazdasági hatáselemzések készítésében. A területi ÁKM-ek terjedésével és az urbanizációs folyamatok erősödésével egyre nagyobb igény fogalmazódott meg a regionális szint alatti input-output modellezés iránt. A regionális-megyei szintű elemzések nem képesek figyelembe venni a városi-várostérségi gazdaságok különbségeit és azok más térségekkel való összefonódásának sajátosságait. A várostérségi szintű ÁKM-ek becslése azonban az elérhető adatok szűk köre miatt nehézségekbe ütközik. E tanulmány egy hibrid, részben kérdőíves, részben pedig szekunder adatok bázisán nyugvó, a pécsi várostérség és az ország egyéb térségeit magában foglaló, kétrégiós ÁKM összeállításának lépéseit mutatja be. A tanulmányt illusztratív szakpolitikai elemzés zárja, amely a pécsi várostérség ágazati fejlesztési lehetőségeit értékeli.

Suggested Citation

  • Szabó, Norbert & Bilicz, Hanga Lilla, 2024. "Lokális ágazatközi kapcsolatok - hibrid ÁKM Pécs városrégióban [Local intersectoral linkages: hybrid input-output tables in the Pécs City Region]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 624-652.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2190
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2024.6.624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=2190
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2024.6.624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greenstreet, David, 1989. "A conceptual framework for construction of hybrid regional input-output models," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 283-289.
    2. Heran Zheng & Jing Meng & Zhifu Mi & Malin Song & Yuli Shan & Jiamin Ou & Dabo Guan, 2019. "Linking city‐level input–output table to urban energy footprint: Construction framework and application," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(4), pages 781-795, August.
    3. Takashi Fujimoto, 2019. "Appropriate assumption on cross-hauling national input–output table regionalization," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 106-128, January.
    4. Manfred Lenzen & Richard Wood & Blanca Gallego, 2007. "Some Comments on the GRAS Method," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 461-465.
    5. Koppány, Krisztián & Solt, Katalin & Hunyadi, Zsuzsanna, 2020. "Fesztiválok gazdasági hatáselemzése [An economic impact analysis of Hungarian festivals]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 585-631.
    6. Riccardo Boero & Brian K. Edwards & Michael K. Rivera, 2018. "Regional input–output tables and trade flows: an integrated and interregional non-survey approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 225-238, February.
    7. Georgios Lampiris & Christos Karelakis & Efstratios Loizou, 2020. "Comparison of non-survey techniques for constructing regional input–output tables," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 225-266, November.
    8. Thomas O. Wiedmann & Guangwu Chen & John Barrett, 2016. "The Concept of City Carbon Maps: A Case Study of Melbourne, Australia," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(4), pages 676-691, August.
    9. Johannes Többen & Tobias Heinrich Kronenberg, 2015. "Construction Of Multi-Regional Input--Output Tables Using The Charm Method," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 487-507, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristian Mardones & Darling Silva, 2023. "Evaluation of Non-survey Methods for the Construction of Regional Input–Output Matrices When There is Partial Historical Information," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1173-1205, March.
    2. Fabio Monsalve & Mateo Ortiz & María-Ángeles Cadarso & Enrique Gilles & Jorge Zafrilla & Luis-Antonio López, 2020. "Nesting a city input–output table in a multiregional framework: a case example with the city of Bogota," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Marek Radvanský & Ivan Lichner, 2021. "An alternative approach to the construction of multi-regional input–output tables of the Czech Republic: application of the CHARM method," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1083-1111, November.
    4. A. V. Kotov, 2021. "Options for the Spatial Development of Russia in the Context of Interregional Interactions," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 318-324, May.
    5. Schwärzler, Marion Cornelia & Kronenberg, Tobias, 2017. "Methodology of the Multiregional Health Account for Germany - An Iterative Algorithm-Based Multiregionalization Approach of Supply and Use Tables with Emphasis on Health," MPRA Paper 80712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Alexandros Gkatsikos & Konstadinos Mattas, 2021. "The Paradox of the Virtual Water Trade Balance in the Mediterranean Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Zhai, Yijie & Ma, Xiaotian & Gao, Feng & Zhang, Tianzuo & Hong, Jinglan & Zhang, Xu & Yuan, Xueliang & Li, Xiangzhi, 2020. "Is energy the key to pursuing clean air and water at the city level? A case study of Jinan City, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Meng, Fanxin & Wang, Dongfang & Meng, Xiaoyan & Li, Hui & Liu, Gengyuan & Yuan, Qiuling & Hu, Yuanchao & Zhang, Yi, 2022. "Mapping urban energy–water–land nexus within a multiscale economy: A case study of four megacities in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    9. Sun, Ya-Yen & Cadarso, Maria Angeles & Driml, Sally, 2020. "Tourism carbon footprint inventories: A review of the environmentally extended input-output approach," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Fischer, W. & Hake, J.-Fr. & Kuckshinrichs, W. & Schröder, T. & Venghaus, S., 2016. "German energy policy and the way to sustainability: Five controversial issues in the debate on the “Energiewende”," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1580-1591.
    11. Andrew Crawley & Max Munday & Annette Roberts, 2018. "How serious is a devolved data deficit? A Welsh perspective," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(8), pages 862-876, December.
    12. Thomas Wiedmann & Guangwu Chen & Anne Owen & Manfred Lenzen & Michael Doust & John Barrett & Kristian Steele, 2021. "Three‐scope carbon emission inventories of global cities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 735-750, June.
    13. Federico Riccio & Lorenzo Cresti & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2022. "The labour share along global value chains. Perspectives and evidence from sectoral interdependence," LEM Papers Series 2022/11, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    14. Umed Temursho, 2018. "Entropy‐based benchmarking methods," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 72(4), pages 421-446, November.
    15. Chen, Shaoqing & Long, Huihui & Chen, Bin & Feng, Kuishuang & Hubacek, Klaus, 2020. "Urban carbon footprints across scale: Important considerations for choosing system boundaries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    16. Liu, Lirong & Huang, Guohe & Baetz, Brian & Guan, Yuru & Zhang, Kaiqiang, 2020. "Multi-Dimensional Hypothetical Fuzzy Risk Simulation model for Greenhouse Gas mitigation policy development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    17. Ageliki Anagnostou & Pawel Gajewski, 2021. "Multi-Regional Input–Output Tables for Macroeconomic Simulations in Poland’s Regions," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Sharada Nia Davidson & James Black & Kevin Connolly & Mairi Spowage, 2022. "Improving the Quality of Regional Economic Indicators in the UK: A Framework for the Production of Supply and Use and Input Output Tables for the Four Nations," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2022-14, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    19. DUARTE, Rosa & JIMÉNEZ, Sofía & LANGARITA, Raquel & SÁNCHEZ-CHÓLIZ, Julio, 2015. "Evaluating the structural effects of a big cultural event: the case of the International Expo Zaragoza 2008," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 15(1), pages 65-80.
    20. Alessio Miatto & Nargessadat Emami & Kylie Goodwin & James West & Mohammad Sadegh Taskhiri & Thomas Wiedmann & Heinz Schandl, 2024. "Australia's circular economy metrics and indicators," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(2), pages 216-231, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • D57 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Input-Output Tables and Analysis
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.