IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/scajes/v5y2019i3p64-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labor productivity of Ethiopian large and Medium Scale Manufacturing Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Yismaw Ayelign
  • Lakhwinder Singh

Abstract

Labor productivity growth is directly linked with living standard improvements of an economy. The objective of this paper is to examine the labor productivity growth and determining factors of large and medium manufacturing establishments in Ethiopia using a panel data set over the period 1996-2015 obtained central statistical agency annual survey. Using a model specification test (Hausman), fixed effects estimator is chosen and for the sake of addressing heteroscedasticity as well as serial correlation, variance covariance robust standard error estimation. Based on real value added, the mean labor productivity over the 20 year period is 1,565.33 having a large variability (standard error is 7875.26) showing the existence of high degree of heterogeneity among manufacturing firms whereas labor productivity at real gross sales value is 3,139.48 with standard deviation of about 9531. Labor productivity showed marginally growing trend in both gross output and value added terms. By value added measure, it lies below capital intensity. Among the determining factors of capital intensity, wage per worker, time dummy (2004-2010), firm age and size are statistically significant at 1%. The time dummy (2011-2015) is significant at 10%. Participation in the global market either by importing raw materials or exporting output doesn’t significantly influence labor productivity. As capital intensity increases by 1%, labor productivity increases by 0.165% implying the complementary nature of capital and labor rather than being substitution. When average wage expenditure increases by 1%, labor productivity increases by 0.42%. The labor productivity in period II (2004-2010) is greater than period I (1996-2003) by 8.29% and period III (2011-2015) is greater by 34.94%. As firm age increases by 1 year, labor productivity increases by 0.6% and large firms are less productive than medium firms by 30.88%. Hence, in order to raise labor productivity at value added, firms should spend more on average wage which potentially attracts with more qualified labor and government should give more emphasis on the manufacturing sector as the result during the growth and transformation plan period is much higher than the other two periods. Rather than focusing on large firms which are expected to be more capital intensive more attention should be attracted to medium sized firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Yismaw Ayelign & Lakhwinder Singh, 2019. "Labor productivity of Ethiopian large and Medium Scale Manufacturing Sector," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 5(3), pages 64-70, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:5:y:2019:i:3:p:64-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_270.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_270.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagner, Joachim, 2002. "The causal effects of exports on firm size and labor productivity: first evidence from a matching approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 287-292, October.
    2. Sai Ding & Alessandra Guariglia & Richard Harris, 2016. "The determinants of productivity in Chinese large and medium-sized industrial firms, 1998–2007," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 131-155, April.
    3. Almas Heshmati (ed.), 2018. "Determinants of Economic Growth in Africa," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-76493-1, April.
    4. M. Hsu & B‐L. Chen, 2000. "Labor productivity of small and large manufacturing firms: the case of Taiwan," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(3), pages 270-283, July.
    5. M. Diaz & Rosario Sanchez, 2008. "Firm size and productivity in Spain: a stochastic frontier analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 315-323, March.
    6. Subal C. Kumbhakar & Christopher F. Parmeter & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2022. "Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Foundations and Advances I," Springer Books, in: Subhash C. Ray & Robert G. Chambers & Subal C. Kumbhakar (ed.), Handbook of Production Economics, chapter 8, pages 331-370, Springer.
    7. Abeer Elshennawy & Mohamed Bouaddi, 2018. "Sources of Heterogeneity in Labor Productivity and Total Factor Productivity in Egyptian Manufacturing," Working Papers 1276, Economic Research Forum, revised 26 Dec 2018.
    8. Fallahi, Firouz & Sakineh, Sojoodi & Mehin Aslaninia, Nasim, 2010. "Determinants of Labor Productivity in Iran’s Manufacturing Firms: With Emphasis on Labor Education and Training," MPRA Paper 27447, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Zheng, Lucy & Batuo, Michael Enowbi & Shepherd, David, 2017. "The Impact of Regional and Institutional Factors on Labor Productive Performance—Evidence from the Township and Village Enterprise Sector in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 591-598.
    10. Gokhan Yilmaz, 2016. "Labor productivity in the middle income trap and the graduated countries," Central Bank Review, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, vol. 16(2), pages 73-83.
    11. Robert E. Hall & Charles I. Jones, 1999. "Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(1), pages 83-116.
    12. Mark Rogers & Yi-Ping Tseng, 2000. "Analysing Firm-Level Labour Productivity Using Survey Data," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2000n10, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    13. Thanapol Srithanpong, 2016. "Firm Productivity in Thai Manufacturing Industries: Evidence from Firm-level Panel Data," PIER Discussion Papers 15., Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research, revised Jan 2016.
    14. W. Erwin Diewert, 2016. "Decompositions of Productivity Growth into Sectoral Effects: Some Puzzles Explained," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: William H. Greene & Lynda Khalaf & Robin Sickles & Michael Veall & Marcel-Cristian Voia (ed.), Productivity and Efficiency Analysis, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 1-13, Springer.
    15. McCullough, Ellen B., 2017. "Labor productivity and employment gaps in Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 133-152.
    16. Thanapol Srithanpong, 2016. "Firm Productivity in Thai Manufacturing Industries: Evidence from Firm-level Panel Data," PIER Discussion Papers 15, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abeer Elshennawy & Mohammed Bouaddi, 2021. "Sources of firm-level heterogeneity in labour productivity in Egypt’s manufacturing sector," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(5), pages 2589-2612, May.
    2. Veronika Fenyves & Tibor Tarnóczi & Zoltán Bács & Dóra Kerezsi & Péter Bajnai & Mihály Szoboszlai, 2022. "Financial efficiency analysis of Hungarian agriculture, fisheries and forestry sector," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(11), pages 413-426.
    3. Eric E. O. Opoku & Isabel K. M. Yan & Kate Hynes, 2020. "Reaching up and reaching out: The impact of competition on firms’ productivity and export decisions," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 69-101, February.
    4. You, Kefei & Bianco, Silvia Dal & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2020. "Closing Technological Gaps to Alleviate Poverty: Evidence from 17 Sub-Saharan African Countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Mohammad Abir Shahid Chowdhury & Shuai Chuanmin & Marcela Sokolová & ABM Munibur Rahman & Ahsan Akbar & Zahid Ali & Muhammad Usman, 2021. "Unveiling the Nexus between Access to Electricity, Firm Size and SME’s Performance in Bangladesh: New Evidence Using PSM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Irene Brambilla & Nicolas Depetris Chauvin & Guido Porto, 2015. "Wage and Employment Gains from Exports: Evidence from Developing Countries," Working Papers 2015-28, CEPII research center.
    7. Sanjoy Kumar Saha, 2024. "Does the Impact of the Foreign Direct Investment on Labor Productivity Change Depending on Productive Capacity?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8588-8620, June.
    8. Georges Harb & Charbel Bassil, 2023. "TFP in the Manufacturing Sector: Long-Term Dynamics, Country and Regional Comparative Analysis," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Musa Abdu & Adamu Jibir & Salihu Abdullahi & Aisha Adamu Hassan, 2021. "Drivers of manufacturing firms’ productivity: a micro-perspective to industrialization in Nigeria," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Wim Naudé, 2016. "Entrepreneurship and the Reallocation of African Farmers," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1-2), pages 1-33, June.
    11. Rath, Badri Narayan, 2018. "Productivity growth and efficiency change: Comparing manufacturing- and service-based firms in India," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 447-457.
    12. repec:ilo:ilowps:366690 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Simeon D. Alder, 2016. "In the Wrong Hands: Complementarities, Resource Allocation, and TFP," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 199-241, January.
    14. Vieira, Flávio & MacDonald, Ronald & Damasceno, Aderbal, 2012. "The role of institutions in cross-section income and panel data growth models: A deeper investigation on the weakness and proliferation of instruments," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 127-140.
    15. Paolo Epifani & Gino Gancia, 2008. "The Skill Bias of World Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(530), pages 927-960, July.
    16. Erich Gundlach, 2003. "Growth Effects of EU Membership: The Case of East Germany," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 30(3), pages 237-270, September.
    17. Eicher, Theo S. & Schreiber, Till, 2010. "Structural policies and growth: Time series evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 169-179, January.
    18. Sylvie Démurger & Jeffrey D. Sachs & Wing Thye Woo & Shuming Bao & Gene Chang & Andrew Mellinger, 2002. "Geography, Economic Policy, and Regional Development in China," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 1(1), pages 146-197.
    19. Kieran McQuinn & Karl Whelan, 2007. "Solow ( 1956 ) as a model of cross-country growth dynamics," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 45-62, Spring.
    20. Lee, Jong-Wha, 2005. "Human capital and productivity for Korea's sustained economic growth," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 663-687, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Labor productivity; productivity growth; manufacturing; value added per worker;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B22 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Macroeconomics
    • L16 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics; Macroeconomic Industrial Structure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:5:y:2019:i:3:p:64-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.