IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/scajes/v4y2018i3p47-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online Advertising Impact in the Bio Products Decision Purchase Process

Author

Listed:
  • Raluca-Giorgiana Chivu
  • Ivona Stoica

Abstract

As time passes by, people have become more and more interested in a healthy lifestyle. This is due to a number of external factors (stress, fatigue, sedentariness) that harm the general health of the body. The main idea of this paper is people are turning to various sources of information that are not necessarily scientifically grounded, their main source of information being the online environment to have a healthy lifestyle. For these reasons, we analysed the impact of marketing elements on the nutritional approaches adopted by the consumers and the reasons why they can easily accept information without scientific knowledge that may harm their health. For the same reasons, BIO products have reached in recent years, a more natural, healthier and less harmful idea for most of people with medium and high income.

Suggested Citation

  • Raluca-Giorgiana Chivu & Ivona Stoica, 2018. "Online Advertising Impact in the Bio Products Decision Purchase Process," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 4(3), pages 47-52, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:4:y:2018:i:3:p:47-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_184.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_184.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozinci, Yaacov & Perlman, Yael & Westrich, Sara, 2017. "Competition between organic and conventional products with different utilities and shelf lives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 74-84.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonardo Cei & Gianluca Stefani & Luca Rossetto, 2024. "Twenty Years of Socio-Economic Research on Organic Agriculture Across the World: Looking at the Past to Be Ready for the Future," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Yanan Yu & Yong He & Xuan Zhao & Li Zhou, 2022. "Certify or not? An analysis of organic food supply chain with competing suppliers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(2), pages 645-675, July.
    3. Wen, Xin & Siqin, Tana, 2020. "How do product quality uncertainties affect the sharing economy platforms with risk considerations? A mean-variance analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Nematollahi, Mohammadreza & Tajbakhsh, Alireza & Mosadegh Sedghy, Bahareh, 2021. "The reflection of competition and coordination on organic agribusiness supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Jin Xiao & Ling Xie & Muhammad Faisal Shahzad & Jamshed Khan Khattak, 2020. "The Moderating Role of Product Type in Network Buying Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    6. Maher Agi & Xinghao Yan, 2020. "Greening products in a supply chain under market segmentation and different channel power structures," Post-Print hal-02898158, HAL.
    7. Jun Wang & Song Yao & Xinman Lu & Yu Li, 2019. "Organic Food Labeling and Advertising: A Tripartite Game Model between One Supplier and Two Heterogeneous Manufacturers," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, November.
    8. Raluca-Giorgiana Chivu & Otilia-Elena Platon & Adrian Mociu & Bianca Cristiana Voicu, 2020. "Development of Consumption of BIO products on the Romanian Market: an Entrepreneurial Approach," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 8(1), pages 96-101, May.
    9. Perlman, Yael, 2022. "Pricing decisions of online and offline retailers, each offering a competing benefit," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    10. Chunmei Li & Tianjian Yang & Ying Shi, 2023. "Blockchain Adoption and Organic Subsidy in an Agricultural Supply Chain Considering Market Segmentation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Yael Perlman, 2023. "What type of contract should e-tailers offer sellers when facing internal competition," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1009-1027, December.
    12. Yael Perlman & Yaacov Ozinci & Sara Westrich, 2022. "Pricing decisions in a dual supply chain of organic and conventional agricultural products," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(2), pages 601-616, July.
    13. Agi, Maher A.N. & Yan, Xinghao, 2020. "Greening products in a supply chain under market segmentation and different channel power structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    14. Xue Wang & Jiayuan Zhang & Deqing Ma & Hao Sun, 2023. "Green Agricultural Products Supply Chain Subsidy Scheme with Green Traceability and Data-Driven Marketing of the Platform," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-29, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bio products; decision purchase process; consumer behaviour;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:4:y:2018:i:3:p:47-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.