IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/journl/v9y2017i2p18-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Study Concerning The Current State Of Abusive Clauses In Credit Bank Contracts. From Judicial Practice Section V – Law

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Rodica Tirlea

Abstract

The research focused on the current state of credit bank contracts containing possible abusive clauses. The study was carried out and possible abusive clauses were identified on the types of bank credit agreements within the scientific research platform for the second period of our research, namely December 2014 - April 2017. The study aimed to achieve the objectives set in terms of: grouping of bank lending contracts by types of contracts within the framework of the scientific research platform, study of supplementary acts on credit bank contracts, analysis of contractual clauses by types of bank contracts, it was analyzed and monitored if The form and content of credit agreements is or not identical for each type of contract, if the types of contracts investigated within the framework of the scientific research platform contain possible abusive clauses, the identification of possible abusive clauses in the research banking contracts investigated and finding practical solutions for the protection of clients in bank lending contracts.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Rodica Tirlea, 2017. "Empirical Study Concerning The Current State Of Abusive Clauses In Credit Bank Contracts. From Judicial Practice Section V – Law," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 9(2), pages 18-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:18-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/khe-vol9-nr2-2017/4.%20ABUSIVE%20CLAUSES%20IN%20CREDIT%20BANK.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/khe-vol9-nr2-2017/4.%20ABUSIVE%20CLAUSES%20IN%20CREDIT%20BANK.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bank Credit; Judicial Practice; Framework;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:18-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.