IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/journl/v2y2010i2p52-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ideological Relativity in the Debate and Practice of Economic Policy in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Virgil Baluta

    ("Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University)

Abstract

Economic decisions frequently depend on ideological foundations. However, there are many decisions which are independent of any doctrinaire or ideological orientation. The separation of decisional zones having an ideological component from those without such a component is very important, on account of the different substantiation mechanisms. This research presents the context where such an important problem is debated as well as some reference points in the economic history which have a major role in the evolution of the respective theme. There are also made necessary conceptual delimitations. There are practical and theoretical foundations of certain economic political measures beyond the ideological traditional border of the political parties which are presented and explained within the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Virgil Baluta, 2010. "Ideological Relativity in the Debate and Practice of Economic Policy in Romania," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 2(2), pages 52-61, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:52-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/2010_khe_2_pdf/khe_vol_2_iss_2_52to61.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/2010_khe_2_pdf/khe_vol_2_iss_2_52to61.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ideological relativisation; economic policy; economic science; liberalism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:52-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.