IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kea/keappr/ker-20041231-20-2-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Statics Under Uncertainty With The Monotone Likelihood Ratio Order

Author

Listed:
  • Soo-Jong Kim

    (The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea)

  • Suyeol Ryu

    (Busan Development Institute)

Abstract

In a simple two asset portfolio problem with one-risky and one-safe asset, Landsberger and Meilijson have shown that a monotone likelihood ratio MLR improvement of random returns of the risky asset increases the demand for the asset for all investors with non-decreasing utilities. However, their comparative static statement is made only for the simpest case where the payoff function is linear in both the choice and the random variable. This paper improves the robustness of their result in two ways. One is that the same comparative static statement can also be made for cases of non-linear payoffs.

Suggested Citation

  • Soo-Jong Kim & Suyeol Ryu, 2004. "Comparative Statics Under Uncertainty With The Monotone Likelihood Ratio Order," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 20, pages 293-304.
  • Handle: RePEc:kea:keappr:ker-20041231-20-2-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://keapaper.kea.ne.kr/RePEc/kea/keappr/KER-20041231-20-2-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suyeol Ryu & Iltae Kim & Soo-Jong Kim, 2010. "Comparative Statics under Uncertainty with the Monotone Probability Ratio Order Revisited," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 26, pages 203-222.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Portfolio Selection; Stochastic dominance; likelihood ratio; comparative statics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kea:keappr:ker-20041231-20-2-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: KEA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/keaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.