Author
Abstract
Are hilly and large cities simply not appropriate for the implementation of exclusive bicycle lanes for commuting trips? To rationalize government expenditure, also avoiding negative impacts of eventual idle bicycle lanes, it is crucial to previously understand citizens’ attitudes towards route spatial adversities which could affect the potential demand. Although many studies have been developed to estimate how objectively-measured factors influence the propensity for using bicycles for commuting, there is a gap in the literature for studies which examine how some important factors on route, such as hilliness and distance are perceived by individuals as obstacles to directly cycle to work, taking into account their current mode of transportation. Based on a survey carried out in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, with 2008 respondents, we found that even in a hilly city there may be much room for bicycle commuting: on average, 58% of residents in 67 Belo Horizonte census areas do not find the hilliness along their routes as an impediment to commute by bicycle and 59% of residents in those areas do not consider the distance on route too long for direct home-to-work commuting by bicycle. In this research, we investigated how the perception of gradient, distance, time commuting associated with the respective current mode of transportation and perceived exposure to thefts and traffic accidents along routes jointly influence the willingness to go directly to work only using a bicycle. A two-level ordered category response model was used to estimate these effects for residents of the 67 Belo Horizonte census areas. Hilliness and long distances on route for commuting caused, on average, a decrease of 52% and 36%, respectively, in the odds to commute by bicycle. As the current commuting time increases from 10 to 60 min, the probability of car and public transportation users changing to a bicycle to commute decreases from around 50–21% for car users and to 34% for those using public transportation. Conversely, using the same variation of commuting time, the probability of using a bicycle increases from 58 to 74% for people who currently walk to the workplace, that represents around one third of the study population. Preferable roads for bicycle commuting were identified in Belo Horizonte, with their slope suitability checked by means of a slope map available for its road system. Perceived risk of theft and traffic accidents were not found to be significant for bicycle commuting when suitable exclusive bicycle lanes are provided.
Suggested Citation
David José Ahouagi Vaz Magalhães & Ingrid Belcavello Rigatto, 2025.
"Individual perceptions of critical factors on route affecting the willingness of direct commuting trips by bicycle in a hilly city,"
Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 127-153, February.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10414-z
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-023-10414-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:52:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10414-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.