IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/theord/v98y2025i3d10.1007_s11238-024-10016-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hard vs. soft commitments: experimental evidence from a sample of French gamblers

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Bettega
  • Paolo Crosetto

    (GAEL, INRAE, CNRS, Grenoble INP, Univ. Grenoble-Alpes)

  • Dimitri Dubois

    (CEE-M, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro)

  • Rustam Romaniuc

    (Montpellier Business School)

Abstract

People use commitment devices to formalize and facilitate their goals. Self-commitments are ubiquitous and may take different forms: soft, when the commitment can be broken at a low cost, or hard, when that cost is high. The effects of soft and hard commitments have usually been studied separately. We conduct an online experiment with 1527 individuals representative of a big gambling company’s client population to study the comparative effects of hard and soft commitment devices in a risk taking game. Our results show that asking for a limit leads subjects to reduce their risk-taking even when the limit turns out to be non-binding, i.e., the commitment is ex-post soft. Hard commitments lead to slightly lower levels of risk taking.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Bettega & Paolo Crosetto & Dimitri Dubois & Rustam Romaniuc, 2025. "Hard vs. soft commitments: experimental evidence from a sample of French gamblers," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 98(3), pages 447-472, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:98:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-024-10016-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11238-024-10016-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-024-10016-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11238-024-10016-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:98:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-024-10016-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.