Author
Listed:
- Parisa Haim Faridian
(San Diego State University)
- Donald Neubaum
(Florida Atlantic University)
- Siri Terjesen
(Florida Atlantic University)
Abstract
This study investigates how adopting causation process during early stages of venture development can impact long-term innovation outcomes directly and indirectly through its interactions with three forms social capital. To do so, we use a sample of 1,214 new ventures in the U.S. and offer several contributions to theory and practice. First, by drawing on theories of entrepreneurial approaches, social networks, and innovation, it advances the theoretical understanding of the intersection of these areas. Second, the study uses a longitudinal approach to offer empirical evidence supporting the enduring effect of decision-making logics during early stages of new venture development on long-term innovation performance. Third, the findings of this study suggest that the dimensionality of causation is complex as presented in the heterogenous effects of the dimensions of causation on innovativeness, ranging from positive, to negative, to nonsignificant effects. Lastly, it offers insights on the complex indirect effects of causal approaches on innovativeness in new ventures, as they can both diminish and enhance the benefits of the three forms of social capital. Plain English Summary How founders’ adoption of entrepreneurial approaches during early stages of venture development can impact long-term innovation outcomes directly and indirectly through its interaction with social capital. Innovation is critical for the success of new ventures, and entrepreneurs rely on decision-making strategies to create new and innovative products or services. The causal decision-making process, which represents predetermined, planned, and well-defined decision-making, promotes innovativeness in various settings (Sarasvathy, Sarasvathy, Academy of Management Review 26:243–263, 2001; Sarasvathy et al., Organization Studies 29:331–350, 2008, 2010; Dew, Sarasvathy, and Venkataraman, 2004; Alvarez & Barney, 2007). However, an interesting paradox emerges as organic, dynamic, and flexible mechanisms, such as social interactions, can also foster innovativeness (Carnabuci and Diószegi, Academy of Management Journal 58:881–905, 2015). Understanding how causal processes interact with other constructs, such as social capital, to either promote or impede innovative outcomes can guide entrepreneurs as they pursue opportunities. Additionally, it is important to understand the long-term implications of the entrepreneurial processes that founders adopt during the early stages of venture development. Taken together, this study investigates how adopting causal processes during the early stages of venture development can have enduring effects on long-term innovation outcome directly and indirectly through its interaction with social capital. To test these theoretical arguments, this study uses data from the second Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED II), which surveyed 1,214 U.S. entrepreneurs between 2006 and 2011 about their ventures. This study offers several contributions. First, by drawing on theories of entrepreneurial processes, social processes, and innovation, we advance our understanding of the intersection of these areas. Second, the longitudinal approach offers empirical evidence supporting the enduring effect of decision-making logics during early stages of new venture development on long-term innovation outcomes. Third, our findings suggest that the dimensionality of causation is complex as presented in the heterogenous effects of the dimensions of causation on innovativeness ranging from positive, to negative, to nonsignificant. Lastly, we offer insights on the complex indirect effect of causal approaches on innovativeness in new ventures.
Suggested Citation
Parisa Haim Faridian & Donald Neubaum & Siri Terjesen, 2025.
"Untangling the complexity of innovativeness in new ventures: The interplay between causal entrepreneurial processes and social capital,"
Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 451-473, February.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:64:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11187-024-00903-5
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-024-00903-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:64:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11187-024-00903-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.