IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/sbusec/v5y1993i4p297-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive Positioning and Innovative Efforts in SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Lefebvre, L A
  • Lefebvre, E

Abstract

This paper reports on the results of a study conducted on 455 smaller manufacturing firms. Its aim was to investigate the relationship between competitive positioning and innovative efforts as measured by R&D expenditures, process innovation, and the use of patent data bases. Results indicate that a relationship does indeed exist and that firms which hold a stronger competitive position in terms of cost, quality, and diversity generally make greater efforts with regard to innovation. In fact, some differences have been found to exist in the intensity of the various innovative efforts between groups of firms having different realized competitive strategies. These findings support the assumption that a link exists between business strategy and innovative efforts, and that this link is strongest in those firms which have the best competitive positioning. Copyright 1993 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Lefebvre, L A & Lefebvre, E, 1993. "Competitive Positioning and Innovative Efforts in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-305, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:5:y:1993:i:4:p:297-305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davood Askarany & Malcolm Smith, 2008. "Diffusion of innovation and business size: a longitudinal study of PACIA," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(9), pages 900-916, October.
    2. Georgiadis, Andreas & Pitelis, Christos N., 2010. "The interrelationship between HR, strategy and profitability in service SMEs: empirical evidence from the UK tourism hospitality and leisure sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28722, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Ezekiel Oluwagbemiga OYEROGBA, 2015. "Management Accounting Practices in the Developing Economies: The Case of Nigeria Listed Companies," The Journal of Accounting and Management, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2, pages 76-85, August.
    4. Askarany, Davood & Yazdifar, Hassan & Askary, Saeed, 2010. "Supply chain management, activity-based costing and organisational factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 238-248, October.
    5. Hanna Rydehell & Anders Isaksson & Hans Löfsten, 2019. "Business networks and localization effects for new Swedish technology-based firms’ innovation performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1547-1576, October.
    6. Maman Setiawan & Rina Indiastuti & Peggie Destevanie, 2014. "Information Technology and Competitiveness: Evidence from Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Survey in Cimahi District, Indonesia," Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 201401, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, revised Feb 2014.
    7. Frédéric Le Roy & Olivier Torrès, 2001. "La place de l'innovation dans les stratégies concurrentielles des P.M.E. internationales," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 13(1), pages 43-60.
    8. Zach, Florian J. & Schnitzer, Martin & Falk, Martin, 2021. "Product diversification and isomorphism: The case of ski resorts and “me-too” innovation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco & Rui Silva & Cidália Oliveira, 2021. "Success Factors of SMEs: Empirical Study Guided by Dynamic Capabilities and Resources-Based View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:5:y:1993:i:4:p:297-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.