IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/rqfnac/v8y1997i1p19-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative Liquidity Measures and Stock Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Kluger, Brian D
  • Stephan, Jens

Abstract

This article compares the properties of several common liquidity measures including the bid-ask spread, the liquidity ratio and firm size. We also use the proportional hazard model to develop a new measure, the relative odds ratio, based on the volume necessary to move prices by a predetermined amount. Although each measure displays a liquidity premium, a composite measure better explains expected returns, suggesting that liquidity is a multidimensional phenomenon. Copyright 1997 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Kluger, Brian D & Stephan, Jens, 1997. "Alternative Liquidity Measures and Stock Returns," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 19-36, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:8:y:1997:i:1:p:19-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0924-865X/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stereńczak, Szymon & Zaremba, Adam & Umar, Zaghum, 2020. "Is there an illiquidity premium in frontier markets?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    2. Carini Manuela & Ciuna Marina & De Ruggiero Manuela & Salvo Francesca & Simonotti Marco, 2017. "Repeat Assessed Values Model for Housing Price Index," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 25(4), pages 25-39, December.
    3. Udomsirikul, Prasit & Jumreornvong, Seksak & Jiraporn, Pornsit, 2011. "Liquidity and capital structure: The case of Thailand," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 106-117, April.
    4. Miriam Marra, 2017. "Explaining co-movements between equity and CDS bid-ask spreads," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 811-853, October.
    5. David Geltner & Bryan D. MacGregor & Gregory M. Schwann, 2003. "Appraisal Smoothing and Price Discovery in Real Estate Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 1047-1064, May.
    6. Jorida Papakroni, 2018. "The dispersion anomaly and analyst recommendations," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 861-896, April.
    7. Prommin, Panu & Jumreornvong, Seksak & Jiraporn, Pornsit, 2014. "The effect of corporate governance on stock liquidity: The case of Thailand," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 132-142.
    8. Zeynep Cobandag Guloglu & Cumhur Ekinci, 2022. "Liquidity measurement: A comparative review of the literature with a focus on high frequency," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 41-74, February.
    9. ElBannan, Mona A., 2017. "Stock market liquidity, family ownership, and capital structure choices in an emerging country," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 201-231.
    10. Ali, Searat & Liu, Benjamin & Su, Jen Je, 2017. "Corporate governance and stock liquidity dimensions: Panel evidence from pure order-driven Australian market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 275-304.
    11. Prommin, Panu & Jumreornvong, Seksak & Jiraporn, Pornsit & Tong, Shenghui, 2016. "Liquidity, ownership concentration, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from Thailand," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 73-87.
    12. Díaz, Antonio & Escribano, Ana, 2020. "Measuring the multi-faceted dimension of liquidity in financial markets: A literature review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    13. Hautsch, Nikolaus, 2002. "Modelling Intraday Trading Activity Using Box-Cox-ACD Models," CoFE Discussion Papers 02/05, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:8:y:1997:i:1:p:19-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.