IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/rqfnac/v57y2021i3d10.1007_s11156-021-00972-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value relevance of comprehensive income under alternative presentation formats permitted by ASU 2011-05

Author

Listed:
  • Li Huang

    (Louisiana State University Shreveport)

  • Marc Cussatt

    (Clemson University)

  • Bernard Wong-On-Wing

    (Washington State University)

Abstract

Under Accounting Standards Update 2011-05, firms can present comprehensive income (CI), defined as the sum of net income (NI) and other comprehensive income (OCI), in a single continuous statement or two separate, consecutive statements. We identify whether firms use the one- or two-statement approach for the years 2012–2015 and assess the value relevance of CI, NI, and OCI under the alternative approaches. We find that NI is less value relevant under the one-statement approach relative to the two-statement approach, while the value relevance OCI is marginally enhanced. We also find that the decrease (increase) in value relevance of NI (OCI) under the one-statement approach is driven by a decrease (an increase) in the value relevance of operating income (unrealized gains/losses on securitized assets). Additional analyses demonstrate that the reduced value relevance of NI under the one-statement approach persists only in subsamples that report positive OCI. Our findings suggest that, consistent with arguments put forth in comment letters in support of the one-statement approach, increasing the prominence of OCI may result in investors incorporating this information to a greater extent in their valuation decisions. However, consistent with comment letters in opposition to the one-statement approach, we also present evidence that suggests presenting OCI in the same statement as NI may also draw attention away from the portion of NI that reflects the core operations of the firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Huang & Marc Cussatt & Bernard Wong-On-Wing, 2021. "The value relevance of comprehensive income under alternative presentation formats permitted by ASU 2011-05," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1123-1153, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:57:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11156-021-00972-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11156-021-00972-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11156-021-00972-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11156-021-00972-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham, John R. & Harvey, Campbell R. & Rajgopal, Shiva, 2005. "The economic implications of corporate financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-3), pages 3-73, December.
    2. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    3. Mitchell A. Petersen, 2009. "Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(1), pages 435-480, January.
    4. Kin-Wai Lee & Gillian Hian-Heng Yeo, 2016. "The association between integrated reporting and firm valuation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1221-1250, November.
    5. Barth, Mary E. & Beaver, William H. & Landsman, Wayne R., 2001. "The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 77-104, September.
    6. Dhaliwal, Dan & Subramanyam, K. R. & Trezevant, Robert, 1999. "Is comprehensive income superior to net income as a measure of firm performance?1," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1-3), pages 43-67, January.
    7. Santanu Mitra & Mahmud Hossain, 2009. "Value-relevance of pension transition adjustments and other comprehensive income components in the adoption year of SFAS No. 158," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 279-301, October.
    8. David Hirshleifer & Sonya Seongyeon Lim & Siew Hong Teoh, 2009. "Driven to Distraction: Extraneous Events and Underreaction to Earnings News," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(5), pages 2289-2325, October.
    9. Yen†Jung Lee & Kathy R. Petroni & Min Shen, 2006. "Cherry Picking, Disclosure Quality, and Comprehensive Income Reporting Choices: The Case of Property†Liability Insurers," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 655-692, September.
    10. Hirst, DE & Hopkins, PE, 1998. "Comprehensive income reporting and analysts' valuation judgments," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36, pages 47-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Mechelli & Riccardo Cimini, 2013. "Assessing value relevance of comprehensive income in European banks and other financial institutions," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 13-41.
    2. Alessandro Mechelli & Riccardo Cimini, 2014. "Is Comprehensive Income Value Relevant and Does Location Matter? A European Study," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 59-87, June.
    3. Mary E. Barth & Javier Gomez-Biscarri & Ron Kasznik & Germán López-Espinosa, 2017. "Bank earnings and regulatory capital management using available for sale securities," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1761-1792, December.
    4. Schaberl, Philipp D. & Victoravich, Lisa M., 2015. "Reporting location and the value relevance of accounting information: The case of other comprehensive income," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 239-246.
    5. Murad Harasheh & Federica Doni & Maria Vittoria Franceschelli & Andrea Amaduzzi, 2021. "The value relevance of Other Comprehensive Income: Extensive evidence from Europe," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 3835-3851, July.
    6. Karola Bastini & Rainer Kasperzak, 2013. "Erkenntnisfortschritt in der Rechnungslegung durch experimentelle Forschung? — Diskussion methodischer Grundsatzfragen anhand der Entscheidungsnützlichkeit des Performance Reporting," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(7), pages 622-660, December.
    7. Leye Li & Louise Yi Lu & Dongyue Wang, 2022. "External labour market competitions and stock price crash risk: evidence from exposures to competitor CEOs’ award‐winning events," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1421-1460, April.
    8. Jincheol Bae & Jaehong Lee & Eunsoo Kim, 2019. "Does Fixed Asset Revaluation Build Trust between Management and Investors?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Yiting Cao & Qi (Flora) Dong, 2020. "Does reporting position affect the pricing of the volatility of comprehensive income?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(9-10), pages 1113-1150, October.
    10. Palea, Vera & Scagnelli, Simone Domenico, 2014. "Do Earnings Reported under IFRS Improve the Prediction of Future Cash Flows? Evidence From European Banks," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201443, University of Turin.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2165 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. He, Wen & Li, Yan, 2020. "Comparing with the average: Reference points and market reactions to above-average earnings surprises," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    13. Koonce, Lisa & Mongold, Cassie & Quaid, Laura & White, Brian J., 2024. "Experimental research on standard-setting issues in financial reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    14. Sudipta Bose & Amitav Saha & Indra Abeysekera, 2020. "The Value Relevance of Corporate Social Responsibility Expenditure: Evidence from Regulatory Decisions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(4), pages 455-494, December.
    15. Xiang Liu, 2014. "Venture capitalists and portfolio companies’ real activities manipulation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 173-210, July.
    16. Igor Goncharov & Allan Hodgson, 2008. "Comprehensive Income In Europe: Valuation, Prediction And Conservative Issues," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(10), pages 1-1.
    17. Matthew C. Cedergren & Changling Chen & Kai Chen, 2019. "The implication of unrecognized asset value on the relation between market valuation and debt valuation adjustment," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 426-455, June.
    18. Kanagaretnam, Kiridaran & Lim, Chee Yeow & Lobo, Gerald J., 2010. "Auditor reputation and earnings management: International evidence from the banking industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2318-2327, October.
    19. Federica Doni & Silvia Rossetti & Roberto Verona, 2017. "Performance Reporting Choices after the Adoption of IAS 1 Revised: Comparative Evidence from Europe and the USA," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(4), pages 558-574.
    20. Bin Miao & Siew Hong Teoh & Zinan Zhu, 2016. "Limited attention, statement of cash flow disclosure, and the valuation of accruals," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 473-515, June.
    21. Shi, Linna & Wang, Ping & Zhou, Nan, 2017. "Enhanced disclosure of other comprehensive income and increased usefulness of net income: The implications of Accounting Standards Update 2011–05," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 139-144.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:57:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11156-021-00972-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.