IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/rqfnac/v23y2004i2p167-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price Expectation and the Pricing of Stock Index Futures

Author

Listed:
  • Hsinan Hsu
  • Janchung Wang

Abstract

Capital markets are not perfect or frictionless, and arbitrage mechanism cannot be complete, particularly for index arbitrage. This study constructs a theoretical foundation to explain why the price expectation of the underlying asset should be entered into the pricing formula of stock index futures. The price expectation and incompleteness of arbitrage then are taken into account to develop a pricing model of stock index futures in imperfect markets. This study also presents three approaches for estimating the model parameter. Finally, the concept of the degree of market imperfection is defined and the valuation model is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsinan Hsu & Janchung Wang, 2004. "Price Expectation and the Pricing of Stock Index Futures," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 167-184, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:23:y:2004:i:2:p:167-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0924-865X/contents
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Hailiang & Sattar, Muhammad Atif & Wang, Haijun, 2024. "Uncertainty measure: As a proxy for the degree of market imperfection," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PB), pages 159-171.
    2. Kapil Gupta & Balwinder Singh, 2007. "Investigating the Pricing Efficiency of Indian Equity Futures Market," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 32(4), pages 486-512, November.
    3. Jacinta Chan Phooi M’ng & Ham Yi Jer, 2021. "Do economic statistics contain information to predict stock indexes futures prices and returns? Evidence from Asian equity futures markets," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1033-1060, October.
    4. Lin, Xiaoqiang & Chen, Qiang & Tang, Zhenpeng, 2014. "Dynamic hedging strategy in incomplete market: Evidence from Shanghai fuel oil futures market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 81-90.
    5. Inci, Ahmet Can & Lu, Biao, 2007. "Currency futures-spot basis and risk premium," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 180-197, April.
    6. Gurmeet Singh, 2017. "Estimating Optimal Hedge Ratio and Hedging Effectiveness in the NSE Index Futures," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 6(2), pages 108-131, December.
    7. Edyta Marcinkiewicz, 2016. "Short Sale and Index Futures Mispricing: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(5), pages 547-559.
    8. Janchung Wang, 2008. "Degree of market imperfections: evidence from four Asian index futures markets," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(15), pages 1233-1246.
    9. Hsinan Hsu & Hsing-Chi Wu & Hsien-Yi Lee & Janchung Wang, 2010. "A measurement of the extent of market imperfections between markets and applications," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(16), pages 2111-2126.
    10. Hsinan Hsu & Yaw-Bin Wang, 2009. "Feasibility of riskless hedged portfolios in imperfect markets," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(11), pages 1149-1153.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:23:y:2004:i:2:p:167-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.