IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/rqfnac/v15y2000i1p57-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Examination of Substitution among Monitoring Devices: The Case of Internal and External Audit Expenditures

Author

Listed:
  • Ettredge, Michael
  • Reed, Margaret
  • Stone, Mary

Abstract

Much of the agency literature assumes that various monitoring devices are partial substitutes in reducing total agency costs. In particular, internal and external auditing often are characterized as monitoring devices that should be partial substitutes. We argue that reliable evidence of this relation is lacking because prior studies using cross-sectional archival data have not carefully considered the implications of microeconomic theory of substitution for the models estimated. Our analysis leads to a reexamination of the relation using time-series data. We find no evidence that systematic substitution of internal for external auditing (or vice versa) occurred during the period 1989-93. Further analysis indicates that the relative prices of internal and external auditing inputs did not change during the period. Therefore a necessary condition for substitution to occur did not exist. Although we do not detect substitution with our sample, the analysis and methodology we develop contribute to the literature by enhancing researchers' understanding of substitution among monitoring methods. Copyright 2000 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Ettredge, Michael & Reed, Margaret & Stone, Mary, 2000. "An Examination of Substitution among Monitoring Devices: The Case of Internal and External Audit Expenditures," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 57-79, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:15:y:2000:i:1:p:57-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0924-865X/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Filip, Andrei, 2016. "Discussion of “Do Reviews by External Auditors Improve the Information Content of Interim Financial Statements”," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 51-56.
    2. Jeffery W. Gunther & Robert R. Moore, 2002. "Auditing the auditors: oversight or overkill?," Economic and Financial Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, vol. 1(5).
    3. Konstantinos Eleftheriou & Iliya Komarev & Paul Klumpes, 2023. "Regulating the Market for Audit Services: A Game Theoretic Approach," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(3), pages 697-734, September.
    4. Marc Eulerich & Christian Lohmann, 2022. "Information Asymmetries and Intra-Company Monitoring: an Empirical Analysis of Nonlinear Relationships Between Company Characteristics and the Size of the Internal Audit Function," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 103-127, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:15:y:2000:i:1:p:57-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.