IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revind/v43y2013i4p265-290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Analysis at the European Commission 2012–2013

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Buettner
  • Giulio Federico
  • Kai-Uwe Kühn
  • Dimitrios Magos

Abstract

In 2012–2013 the European Commission has had particularly prominent merger cases, with two prohibitions of transactions and several clearances with far-reaching remedies. In these cases economic analysis has been tightly integrated into the general argument of the Commission and became central to the outcome of the cases. Based on economic theory and supporting data, the Commission has pursued novel economic theories of harm and challenged some economically dubious “common wisdom” in merger assessment. The second area in which economic analysis has had a major impact is in state aid modernization. The new regional aid guidelines of 2013 have moved the rules much closer to economic thinking about effective regional aid and introduced requirements for economic ex-post analysis. Finally, the decisions on the e-books case reflect close cross-Atlantic cooperation with respect to the economic analysis and the design of appropriate remedies. This article reports on a number of examples for the most important cases. Copyright European Union 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Buettner & Giulio Federico & Kai-Uwe Kühn & Dimitrios Magos, 2013. "Economic Analysis at the European Commission 2012–2013," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 43(4), pages 265-290, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:revind:v:43:y:2013:i:4:p:265-290
    DOI: 10.1007/s11151-013-9413-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11151-013-9413-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11151-013-9413-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giulio Federico & Massimo Motta & Penelope Papandropoulos, 2015. "Recent Developments at DG Competition: 2014," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(4), pages 399-423, December.
    2. Buettner, Thomas & Federico, Giulio & Lorincz, Szabolcs, 2016. "The Use of Quantitative Economic Techniques in EU Merger Control," MPRA Paper 76384, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revind:v:43:y:2013:i:4:p:265-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.