IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revaec/v38y2025i1d10.1007_s11138-023-00630-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating rationality and spiritedness to correct a misleading dichotomy

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Moore

    (George Mason University Emeritus)

  • Richard E. Wagner

    (George Mason University Emeritus)

Abstract

Economists have long labored under a misleading dichotomy between rationality and spiritedness where a market economy reflects the cool sobriety of rational calculation that sometimes is thought to be impaired by irrational animal spirits. Within this scheme of thought, those individuals who constitute society are effectively reduced to a societal average or representative agent, where aggregation is reflective of choice, rather than interaction. In contrast, we theorize by distinguishing market and state enterprises as creating an observed disordering due to the institutions that govern them. Within this alternative scheme of thought, reason and spirit are both features of the human organism, with individuals varying in the degrees to which their actions entail these features. What results is recognition that orderliness and volatility are both ineradicable features of human population systems, and, moreover, that polity and economy inject non-congruent modes of action into entangled systems of political economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Moore & Richard E. Wagner, 2025. "Integrating rationality and spiritedness to correct a misleading dichotomy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 55-71, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:38:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11138-023-00630-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11138-023-00630-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11138-023-00630-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11138-023-00630-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:38:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11138-023-00630-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.