IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/regeco/v21y2002i1p23-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Regulation and the Courts 1982 to 2001: Ten Cases That Made a Difference

Author

Listed:
  • Kovacic, William E

Abstract

The author has selected ten "landmark" cases for their likely impact on regulation and regulatory economics. His choice is unashamedly his own personal one and he recognizes that other legal scholars would not make the identical selection. However, there is likely to be substantial agreement on the importance of a majority of the cases. The ten cases are concerned with five themes: antitrust policy, contracting around the regulatory state, constitutional and contractual limits on regulation, the distribution of regulatory authority, and economics in the courtroom. Copyright 2002 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Kovacic, William E, 2002. "Economic Regulation and the Courts 1982 to 2001: Ten Cases That Made a Difference," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 23-34, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:regeco:v:21:y:2002:i:1:p:23-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0922-680X/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Crew & Paul Kleindorfer, 2012. "Regulatory economics and the journal of regulatory economics: a 30-year retrospective," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:regeco:v:21:y:2002:i:1:p:23-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.