IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/regeco/v15y1999i1p93-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electric Utility Restructuring, Regulation of Distribution Utilities, and the Fallacy of "Avoided Cost" Rules

Author

Listed:
  • Lesser, Jonathan A
  • Feinstein, Charles D

Abstract

We show that commonly used "avoided cost" rules, which evaluate investment alternatives by comparing their costs to forecasts of future expected cost, are fundamentally flawed for choosing local area investments in distribution capacity. Use of avoided cost rules: 1) confuses cost-effectiveness tests with benefit-cost tests; 2) makes inappropriate marginal comparisons and violates necessary optimality conditions because of the "lumpy" nature of many distribution system investments; 3) fails to incorporate the effects of uncertainty properly; 4) necessarily leads to excess deferral of traditional distribution capacity investments with distributed generation and DSM investments; and 5) does not lead to lowest expected cost investment plans. We conclude by outlining a more appropriate approach to evaluating distribution investments based on evaluations of actual cash flows associated with investment alternatives under uncertainty. Copyright 1999 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Lesser, Jonathan A & Feinstein, Charles D, 1999. "Electric Utility Restructuring, Regulation of Distribution Utilities, and the Fallacy of "Avoided Cost" Rules," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 93-110, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:regeco:v:15:y:1999:i:1:p:93-110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0922-680X/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bhattacharyya, Subhes C & Quoc Thang, Dang Ngoc, 2004. "Economic buy-back rates for electricity from cogeneration: Case of sugar industry in Vietnam," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 1039-1051.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:regeco:v:15:y:1999:i:1:p:93-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.