IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v68y1991i1-3p117-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rational Retaliation: Superpower Response to Crisis, 1948-1979

Author

Listed:
  • James, Patrick

Abstract

Using a modified version of Chicken, referred to as the Threat Game, Brams and Kilgour (1987a; 1987b) have developed a theoretical model of rational retaliation in superpower crises. They derive explicit thresholds for sufficient retaliation against provocations to deter them in the first place. When the retaliating move meets or is more coercive than a threshold value, it is rational for the adversaries to prefer to desist from conflict, whereas a response that is too cooperative will not provide the same incentive. Data on superpower crises from 1948 to 1979 will be used to test a modified version of the model developed by Brams and Kilgour. A description of their model, culminating in some revisions, is the point of departure. Selection of cases from the International Crisis Behavior (ICB) Project data set, operationalization of the model and testing will follow. Finally, implications of the generally positive findings are discussed. Copyright 1991 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • James, Patrick, 1991. "Rational Retaliation: Superpower Response to Crisis, 1948-1979," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 68(1-3), pages 117-135, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:68:y:1991:i:1-3:p:117-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:68:y:1991:i:1-3:p:117-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.