IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v33y1978i1p85-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic voting and the borda method

Author

Listed:
  • William Ludwin

Abstract

It is more likely that strategic voting will occur when the number of voters is small, such as in a committee, and outcomes more directly affect them. As the number of electors and candidates increases, however, the correct strategy becomes less clear. Opinion polls can indicate preference patterns and voting strength, however, and this can be used by campaign managers to discover the best strategy. It may be expected that they will tell the supporters of their candidate how best to use their votes. Thus, even in situations where there are many voters and more than two candidates, it can be expected that voters will tend to vote strategically because of the activities of political managers. Given this model, voters tend not to vote their preferences, even though it is possible for them to do so. The best outcome which might occur is for the plurality candidate to be elected, as would be the case in a one-vote election. It has been shown, however, that rational action by the voters could result in the second preferred, or least preferred, candidate being elected. In no case was it shown that the best action was to vote one's preference if it is other than the best vote for the first choice and the worst vote for all other candidates. It has not been demonstrated that a rank-preference voting system, such as the one used in the model, will never result in the preferences of the electorate producing the most preferred candidate. What has been demonstrated is that not only will such preference voting systems not always produce this result, but that rational action by voters will not tend to result in the preferences of the electorate being used to determine the most preferred candidate. The implications of this analysis are that remedies for the defects of a single-vote election method based upon preference revelation are not without operational defects themselves. Operationally, they depend upon voters revealing their preferences even if there are incentives to misrepresent them. If the one-vote election method is to be replaced with one that is better able to select the “most preferred” candidate, preference ranking methods may be found operationally wanting. Copyright Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division 1978

Suggested Citation

  • William Ludwin, 1978. "Strategic voting and the borda method," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 85-90, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:33:y:1978:i:1:p:85-90
    DOI: 10.1007/BF00123946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00123946
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF00123946?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krzysztof Kontek & Honorata Sosnowska, 2020. "Specific Tastes or Cliques of Jurors? How to Reduce the Level of Manipulation in Group Decisions?," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1057-1084, December.
    2. Sebastian Kube & Clemens Puppe, 2009. "(When and how) do voters try to manipulate?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 39-52, April.
    3. Aki Lehtinen, 2007. "The Borda rule is also intended for dishonest men," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 73-90, October.
    4. María Teresa Escobar & José María Moreno-jiménez, 2007. "Aggregation of Individual Preference Structures in Ahp-Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 287-301, July.
    5. Hongrui Wang & Linlin Fan & Yuan Liang & Cheng Wang, 2018. "An integrated approach for water scarcity evaluation—a case study of Yunnan, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 109-127, February.
    6. P. Battiston & M. Magnani & D. Paolini & L. Rossi, 2024. "Country vs. Music: Strategic Incentives for Competing Voters," Economics Department Working Papers 2024-EP02, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:33:y:1978:i:1:p:85-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.