IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v115y2003i3-4p477-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could the Florida Election Disaster Have Been Avoided by Competition among Polling Stations?

Author

Listed:
  • Harmgart, Heike
  • Huck, Steffen

Abstract

We study a model of competition among polling stations where polling stations have to invest in counting precision to attract voters. The benchmark is the (current) monopolistic case in which there is no incentive to provide particularly good counting technologies. Unsurprisingly, we find that competition enhances precision when compared to a monopoly. The somewhat surprising part of our result is that the optimal number of polling stations is two. Copyright 2003 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Harmgart, Heike & Huck, Steffen, 2003. "Could the Florida Election Disaster Have Been Avoided by Competition among Polling Stations?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 115(3-4), pages 477-484, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:115:y:2003:i:3-4:p:477-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0048-5829/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:115:y:2003:i:3-4:p:477-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.