IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v113y2002i3-4p465-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Methodology of Contractarianism in Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Muller, Christian

Abstract

The paper explores the methodology of hypothetical contractarianism as a means of justifying rules of social conduct. Formally, the contractarian argument has the logical structure of a familiar deductive-nomological (rational choice) explanation. It necessarily requires, however, that at least some premises used in its explanans be empirically false. It is argued that, in contrast to ordinary explanatory arguments, the contractarian thought experiment would be pointless if all assumptions were empirically true. As a consequence, even in the case that a given contract theory can be proven to be logically consistent, it fails to justify binding obligations of real individuals due to an insurmountable logical problem of induction. Copyright 2002 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Muller, Christian, 2002. "The Methodology of Contractarianism in Economics," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 113(3-4), pages 465-483, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:113:y:2002:i:3-4:p:465-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0048-5829/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Müller Christian, 2007. "Der „harte Kern“ der Finanzwissenschaft: Bemerkungen zu einem Buch von Nils Otter," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 58(1), pages 229-235, January.
    2. Müller Christian, 2004. "Christliche Sozialethik und das Wertproblem in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 55(1), pages 77-98, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:113:y:2002:i:3-4:p:465-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.