IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v107y2001i3-4p333-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Colour of the Judge's Eyes: Efficiency as a Criterion for the Legislature and for the Courts

Author

Listed:
  • Usher, Dan

Abstract

Should courts adjudicate to promote efficiency in the economy, or should courts be content to apply the law as they find it? The literature of law and economics has much to say about how to identify efficiency in the construction of the law, but little to say about whose business it is to promote efficiency in the law, in so far as efficiency is warranted. It is argued in this paper that efficiency belongs to the legislature and that adjudication for efficiency by the courts is self-defeating. Copyright 2001 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Usher, Dan, 2001. "The Colour of the Judge's Eyes: Efficiency as a Criterion for the Legislature and for the Courts," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 107(3-4), pages 333-357, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:107:y:2001:i:3-4:p:333-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0048-5829/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology
    • K1 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:107:y:2001:i:3-4:p:333-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.