IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v104y2000i3-4p309-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contractual Fiscal Equivalence versus Geographical Fiscal Equivalence

Author

Listed:
  • Eusepi, Giuseppe

Abstract

This work extends the contractual procedure, normally used in the relationships among persons, to intergovernmental relationships namely those among local jurisdictions. This changing in perspective challenges the efficiency criterion based on geographical fiscal equivalence; in fact the level of equilibrium does not depend on the level of the public good provided per se; it rather depends on the fiscal system, on the position of the median voter, on whether interjurisdictional mobility is either favoured or forbidden, and finally on whether the central government uses transfers either for redistributive purposes or as payments of the services provided by local jurisdictions. In particular, the paper shows that if two jurisdictions of the same level are allowed to have contractual relationships (horizontal relationships) the more efficient of the two can sell the service also to the less efficient, so reducing citizens' unit costs. Copyright 2000 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Eusepi, Giuseppe, 2000. "Contractual Fiscal Equivalence versus Geographical Fiscal Equivalence," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 104(3-4), pages 309-317, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:104:y:2000:i:3-4:p:309-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0048-5829/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jae Kim & Seung-Nam Kim & Soogwan Doh, 2015. "The distance decay of willingness to pay and the spatial distribution of benefits and costs for the ecological restoration of an urban branch stream in Ulsan, South Korea," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 835-853, May.
    2. Giuseppe Eusepi & Edgar Wilson, 2008. "How to make a dis-entrepreneur of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur: the impact of institutional settings on growth," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 39-54, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:104:y:2000:i:3-4:p:309-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.