IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v36y2025i1d10.1007_s11002-024-09728-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Filtering a beauty justification: the effect of filtered selfies on preferences for hedonic versus utilitarian products

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Chen

    (School of Management, Xiamen University)

  • Ting Xu

    (School of Management, Xiamen University)

  • Yanghan Guo

    (School of Management, Xiamen University)

Abstract

Filtered selfies are prevalent on social media and are considered an effective way to project an ideal self. Built-in editing by beauty filters allows the user to easily obtain an enhanced self-image in a second, and such auto-editing filters are employed across a multitude of contexts. In the present research, we explore the effect of filtered selfies on product preference. Four studies with various real filtered selfie manipulations and an ancillary study reveal that filtered selfies promote a preference for hedonic over utilitarian products through self-worth, and this justification effect is attenuated among individuals exhibiting high levels of lay rationalism and when beauty-editing cues are salient. The studies ruled out alternative explanations of emotions and visceral state. The findings indicate the justification effect of filtered selfies for hedonic versus utilitarian products, which contributes to the literature on selfies, hedonic consumption, and practical suggestions for marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Chen & Ting Xu & Yanghan Guo, 2025. "Filtering a beauty justification: the effect of filtered selfies on preferences for hedonic versus utilitarian products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 79-95, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:36:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11002-024-09728-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-024-09728-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-024-09728-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-024-09728-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:36:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11002-024-09728-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.