IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v35y2024i4d10.1007_s11002-024-09724-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling misinformation spread for policy evaluation: a parsimonious framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yiting Deng

    (UCL School of Management, University College London)

  • Richard Staelin

    (Duke University)

Abstract

We develop a parsimonious framework for evaluating the efficacy of different approaches for limiting the spread of misinformation. We use this framework and simulation studies to determine the evolution of truthful and fake messages on social media platforms and then investigate the following policy interventions: (1) our suggested approach of having the platform require senders of messages to also state their perceived (possibly incorrect) veracity of the message, (2) provide some accuracy nudge to increase the number of potential readers who can accurately identify fake messages, (3) have the platform flag fake messages, and (4) have the platform demote or down-rank fake messages. We find that when a significant number of senders are able to correctly identify the veracity of the message, the market can self-regulate under our suggested approach. If this is not the case, we find that augmenting our approach with any of the other approaches is effective in reducing the spread of misinformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiting Deng & Richard Staelin, 2024. "Modeling misinformation spread for policy evaluation: a parsimonious framework," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 635-649, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:35:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11002-024-09724-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-024-09724-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-024-09724-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-024-09724-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:35:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11002-024-09724-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.