IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jrefec/v16y1998i2p205-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Costs of Free Land: The Oklahoma Land Rushes

Author

Listed:
  • Bohanon, Cecil E
  • Coelho, Philip R P

Abstract

There is an extensive literature in economic history on the disposition of public lands of the United States. Absent from this literature is any consideration of the Oklahoma Territory and the two unusual methods used to dispose of its lands. One method was a land rush where entrants literally raced to claim surveyed lots; the other was a lottery where random chance determined who won. This article develops a model of resource allocation applicable to land rushes and lotteries and examines evidence drawn from the Oklahoma land competitions. The model suggests that rent dissipation occurred. The available evidence corroborates this: some, if not all, of the benefits participants gained from the allocation of "free lands" were dissipated, although there are distinguishable differences in the real costs imposed by the two methods. Copyright 1998 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Bohanon, Cecil E & Coelho, Philip R P, 1998. "The Costs of Free Land: The Oklahoma Land Rushes," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 205-221, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jrefec:v:16:y:1998:i:2:p:205-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0895-5638/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Douglas W. Allen & Bryan Leonard, 2020. "How many rushed during the Oklahoma land openings?," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 14(2), pages 397-416, May.
    2. Sebastián D. Bauer, 2023. "Buyers’ welfare maximizing auction design," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(2), pages 555-567, June.
    3. Brian Kogelmann, 2021. "Lockeans against labor mixing," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 20(3), pages 251-272, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jrefec:v:16:y:1998:i:2:p:205-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.