IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jmgtgv/v23y2019i1d10.1007_s10997-018-9424-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance and leadership implications for academic professionals in the era of technological disruption

Author

Listed:
  • Philippa Wells

    (Federation University Australia)

  • Coral Ingley

    (Auckland University of Technology)

Abstract

Whether employee unions have a role to play in Universities (and what that role might be) has always been troubling, with views ranging from philosophical antipathy to wholesale endorsement. In some jurisdictions, levels of membership and support also have varied in response to such external factors as statutory changes to governance structures of universities, voluntary unionism, changes to the direct role of unions in furthering the statutory responsibilities of employers such as in promotion of health and safety in the workplace, and such internal factors as casualisation, centralisation of power and decision making and policies of workforce flexibility via redundancy and other strategies. An emerging “threat” that is garnering increasing levels of concern is that of disruptive automation in the higher education sphere, not only in ancillary functions such as learning management systems, information processing and provision of student support services, but also going to the root of the academic function—the education experience. This development will have fundamental implications for higher education, as for other service industries, and poses essential challenges for employee unions in terms of their relevance, governance and leadership, particularly where that automation threatens job security and careers. This paper will explore those challenges by reference to analogous developments such as MOOCs, “cookie-cutter” courses and programs, casualisation and the growth in on-line, flexible and blended delivery modes. As a review and commentary, the exploration will focus on the Australian context but to ensure broader relevance, will be grounded in political economy, reflecting the tensions that emerge between the funders of universities, both public and private, who seek higher profits, control and power, and those who see universities as a fundamental social institution. Arguably, it is in the space created by such tensions that the future for unions is located. It is a matter of determining what that future looks like. This approach permits both contextualisation of the discussion and provides opportunities for international comparisons, thereby providing a basis for future research within the context of academic leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippa Wells & Coral Ingley, 2019. "Governance and leadership implications for academic professionals in the era of technological disruption," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(1), pages 21-32, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jmgtgv:v:23:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10997-018-9424-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10997-018-9424-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10997-018-9424-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10997-018-9424-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2008. "The Political Economy of Policy Reform : Issues and Implications for Policy Dialogue and Development Operations," World Bank Publications - Reports 7782, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nino Tandilashvili & Anna Tandilashvili, 2022. "Academics’ perception of identity (re)construction: a value conflict created by performance orientation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(2), pages 389-416, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arjan de Haan & Ward Warmerdam, 2012. "The politics of aid revisited: a review of evidence on state capacity and elite commitment," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-007-12, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    2. James Copestake & Richard Williams, 2014. "Political-Economy Analysis, Aid Effectiveness and the Art of Development Management," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 32(1), pages 133-153, January.
    3. Benjamin P. Warner & Daniel L. Childers & Christopher Kuzdas & Gabriela Stocks, 2018. "Smallholder Adaptation to Drought in Costa Rica's Crony Capitalist Rice Economy," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(6), pages 1392-1421, November.
    4. Quitzow, Rainer & Thielges, Sonja & Goldthau, Andreas & Helgenberger, Sebastian & Mbungu, Grace, 2019. "Advancing a global transition to clean energy: The role of international cooperation," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 13, pages 1-18.
    5. Emmanuel Botlhale, 2015. "The Political Economy of Poverty Eradication in Botswana," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 406-419, December.
    6. Susan Johnson & Richard Williams, 2016. "The political economy of financial inclusion: tailoring donor policy to fit," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(5), pages 721-743, September.
    7. S.A.R, Tharanga, 2018. "The Impact of Politics in Policy Reforms," MPRA Paper 88747, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Beuran, Monica & Raballand, Gael & Kapoor, Kapil, 2011. "Political economy studies: are they actionable ? some lessons from Zambia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5656, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jmgtgv:v:23:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10997-018-9424-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.