IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jgeosy/v26y2024i3d10.1007_s10109-024-00442-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Speeding up estimation of spatially varying coefficients models

Author

Listed:
  • Ghislain Geniaux

    (Ecodéveloppement, UR 767, INRAE)

Abstract

Spatially varying coefficient models, such as GWR (Brunsdon et al. in Geogr Anal 28:281–298, 1996 and McMillen in J Urban Econ 40:100–124, 1996), find extensive applications across various fields, including housing markets, land use, population ecology, seismology, and mining research. These models are valuable for capturing the spatial heterogeneity of coefficient values. In many application areas, the continuous expansion of spatial data sample sizes, in terms of both volume and richness of explanatory variables, has given rise to new methodological challenges. The primary issues revolve around the time required to calculate each local coefficients and the memory requirements imposed for storing the large hat matrix (of size $$n \times n$$ n × n ) for parameter variance estimation. Researchers have explored various approaches to address these challenges (Harris et al. in Trans GIS 14:43–61, 2010, Pozdnoukhov and Kaiser in: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, 2011; Tran et al. in: 2016 Eighth International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE), IEEE, 2016; Geniaux and Martinetti in Reg Sci Urban Econ 72:74–85, 2018; Li et al. in Int J Geogr Inf Sci 33:155–175, 2019; Murakami et al. in Ann Am Assoc Geogr 111:459–480, 2020). While the use of a subset of target points for local regressions has been extensively studied in nonparametric econometrics, its application within the context of GWR has been relatively unexplored. In this paper, we propose an original two-stage method designed to accelerate GWR computations. We select a subset of target points based on the spatial smoothing of residuals from a first-stage regression, conducting GWR solely on this subsample. Additionally, we propose an original approach for extrapolating coefficients to non-target points. In addition to using an effective sample of target points, we explore the computational gain provided by using truncated Gaussian kernel to create sparser matrices during computation. Our Monte Carlo experiments demonstrate that this method of target point selection outperforms methods based on point density or random selection. The results also reveal that using target points can reduce bias and root mean square error (RMSE) in estimating $$\beta$$ β coefficients compared to traditional GWR, as it enables the selection of a more accurate bandwidth size. We demonstrate that our estimator is scalable and exhibits superior properties in this regard compared to the (Murakami et al. in Ann Am Assoc Geogr 111:459–480, 2020) estimator under two conditions: the use of a ratio of target points that provides satisfactory approximation of coefficients (10–20 % of locations) and an optimal bandwidth that remains within a reasonable neighborhood ( $$

Suggested Citation

  • Ghislain Geniaux, 2024. "Speeding up estimation of spatially varying coefficients models," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 293-327, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:26:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10109-024-00442-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10109-024-00442-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10109-024-00442-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10109-024-00442-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daisuke Murakami & Narumasa Tsutsumida & Takahiro Yoshida & Tomoki Nakaya & Binbin Lu, 2020. "Scalable GWR: A Linear-Time Algorithm for Large-Scale Geographically Weighted Regression with Polynomial Kernels," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(2), pages 459-480, August.
    2. Daniel P. McMillen & Christian L. Redfearn, 2010. "Estimation And Hypothesis Testing For Nonparametric Hedonic House Price Functions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 712-733, August.
    3. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Wenbai Yang & Wei Kang, 2017. "Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR)," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(6), pages 1247-1265, November.
    4. Gollini, Isabella & Lu, Binbin & Charlton, Martin & Brunsdon, Christopher & Harris, Paul, 2015. "GWmodel: An R Package for Exploring Spatial Heterogeneity Using Geographically Weighted Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i17).
    5. Daniel P. McMillen, 2012. "Perspectives On Spatial Econometrics: Linear Smoothing With Structured Models," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 192-209, May.
    6. McMillen, Daniel P., 1996. "One Hundred Fifty Years of Land Values in Chicago: A Nonparametric Approach," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 100-124, July.
    7. Daniel McMillen & Maria Edisa Soppelsa, 2015. "A Conditionally Parametric Probit Model Of Microdata Land Use In Chicago," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 391-415, June.
    8. Chang‐Lin Mei & Shu‐Yuan He & Kai‐Tai Fang, 2004. "A Note on the Mixed Geographically Weighted Regression Model," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 143-157, February.
    9. Eddelbuettel, Dirk & Francois, Romain, 2011. "Rcpp: Seamless R and C++ Integration," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 40(i08).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geniaux, Ghislain & Martinetti, Davide, 2018. "A new method for dealing simultaneously with spatial autocorrelation and spatial heterogeneity in regression models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 74-85.
    2. Daniel McMillen & Maria Edisa Soppelsa, 2015. "A Conditionally Parametric Probit Model Of Microdata Land Use In Chicago," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 391-415, June.
    3. McMillen, Daniel, 2015. "Conditionally parametric quantile regression for spatial data: An analysis of land values in early nineteenth century Chicago," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 28-38.
    4. Chang-Lin Mei & Feng Chen & Wen-Tao Wang & Peng-Cheng Yang & Si-Lian Shen, 2021. "Efficient estimation of heteroscedastic mixed geographically weighted regression models," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 66(1), pages 185-206, February.
    5. Chunfang Zhao & Yingliang Wu & Yunfeng Chen & Guohua Chen, 2023. "Multiscale Effects of Hedonic Attributes on Airbnb Listing Prices Based on MGWR: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Li Gao & Mingjing Huang & Wuping Zhang & Lei Qiao & Guofang Wang & Xumeng Zhang, 2021. "Comparative Study on Spatial Digital Mapping Methods of Soil Nutrients Based on Different Geospatial Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Daniel P. McMillen, 2010. "Issues In Spatial Data Analysis," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 119-141, February.
    8. Yigong Hu & Binbin Lu & Yong Ge & Guanpeng Dong, 2022. "Uncovering spatial heterogeneity in real estate prices via combined hierarchical linear model and geographically weighted regression," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1715-1740, July.
    9. Martinetti, Davide & Geniaux, Ghislain, 2017. "Approximate likelihood estimation of spatial probit models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 30-45.
    10. Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M. & Maennig, Wolfgang, 2015. "Homevoters vs. leasevoters: A spatial analysis of airport effects," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 85-99.
    11. Erasmo Giambona & Rafael P. Ribas, 2023. "Unveiling the Price of Obscenity: Evidence From Closing Prostitution Windows in Amsterdam," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 677-705, June.
    12. Rémy Le Boennec & Julie Bulteau & Thierry Feuillet, 2022. "The role of commuter rail accessibility in the formation of residential land values: exploring spatial heterogeneity in peri-urban and remote areas," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(1), pages 163-186, August.
    13. Yoo, James & Simonit, Silvio & Connors, John P. & Maliszewski, Paul J. & Kinzig, Ann P. & Perrings, Charles, 2013. "The value of agricultural water rights in agricultural properties in the path of development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 57-68.
    14. Basile, Roberto & Durbán, María & Mínguez, Román & María Montero, Jose & Mur, Jesús, 2014. "Modeling regional economic dynamics: Spatial dependence, spatial heterogeneity and nonlinearities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 229-245.
    15. Aaron Swoboda & Tsegaye Nega & Maxwell Timm, 2015. "Hedonic Analysis Over Time And Space: The Case Of House Prices And Traffic Noise," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 644-670, September.
    16. Diana Gutiérrez-Posada & Fernando Rubiera-Morollon & Ana Viñuela, 2017. "Heterogeneity in the Determinants of Population Growth at the Local Level," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(3), pages 211-240, May.
    17. Paul Harris & Bruno Lanfranco & Binbin Lu & Alexis Comber, 2020. "Influence of Geographical Effects in Hedonic Pricing Models for Grass-Fed Cattle in Uruguay," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M. & Maennig, Wolfgang, 2015. "Homevoters vs. leasevoters: A spatial analysis of airport effects," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 85-99.
    19. Nana Yang & Jiansong Li & Binbin Lu & Minghai Luo & Linze Li, 2019. "Exploring the Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Land Carrying Capacity in Wuhan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Pede, Valerien O. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M. & Lambert, Dayton M., 2014. "Spatial econometric STAR models: Lagrange multiplier tests, Monte Carlo simulations and an empirical application," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 118-128.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Geographically weighted regression; Target points; Truncated Gaussian kernel; Scalability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:26:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10109-024-00442-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.