IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jgeosy/v15y2013i4p491-512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedging against service disruptions: an expected median location problem with site-dependent failure probabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Lei
  • Daoqin Tong

Abstract

The vector assignment p-median problem (VAPMP) (Weaver and Church in Transp Sci 19(1):58–74, 1985 ) was one of the first location-allocation models developed to handle split assignment of a demand to multiple facilities. The underlying construct of the VAPMP has been subsequently used in a number of reliable facility location and backup location models. Although in many applications the chance that a facility fails may vary substantially with locations, many existing models have assumed a uniform failure probability across all sites. As an improvement, this paper proposes a new model, the expected p-median problem as a generalization of existing approaches by explicitly considering site-dependent failure probabilities. Multi-level closest assignment constraints and two efficient integer linear programming (ILP) formulations are introduced. While prior research generally concludes that similar problems are not integer-friendly and cannot be solved by ILP software, computational results show that our model can be used to solve medium-sized location problems optimally using existing ILP software. Moreover, the new model can be used to formulate other reliable or expected location problems with consideration of site-dependent failure probabilities. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Lei & Daoqin Tong, 2013. "Hedging against service disruptions: an expected median location problem with site-dependent failure probabilities," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 491-512, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:15:y:2013:i:4:p:491-512
    DOI: 10.1007/s10109-012-0175-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10109-012-0175-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10109-012-0175-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan T. Murray & Tony H. Grubesic, 2007. "Overview of Reliability and Vulnerability in Critical Infrastructure," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Alan T. Murray & Tony H. Grubesic (ed.), Critical Infrastructure, chapter 1, pages 1-8, Springer.
    2. Mark S. Daskin, 1983. "A Maximum Expected Covering Location Model: Formulation, Properties and Heuristic Solution," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 48-70, February.
    3. Tingting Cui & Yanfeng Ouyang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under the Risk of Disruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 998-1011, August.
    4. Kathleen Hogan & Charles ReVelle, 1986. "Concepts and Applications of Backup Coverage," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(11), pages 1434-1444, November.
    5. Luke Shillington & Daoqin Tong, 2011. "Maximizing Wireless Mesh Network Coverage," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 34(4), pages 419-437, October.
    6. Richard Wollmer, 1964. "Removing Arcs from a Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(6), pages 934-940, December.
    7. Mozart Menezes & O. Berman & D. Krass, 2007. "Facility Reliability Issues in Network p-Median Problems: Strategic Centralization and Co-location Effects," Post-Print halshs-00170396, HAL.
    8. Alan Murray & Timothy Matisziw & Tony Grubesic, 2007. "Critical network infrastructure analysis: interdiction and system flow," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 103-117, June.
    9. Cui, Tingting & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max J, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design under the Risk of Disruptions," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5sh2c7pw, University of California Transportation Center.
    10. Tony H. Grubesic & Timothy C. Matisziw & Alan T. Murray & Diane Snediker, 2008. "Comparative Approaches for Assessing Network Vulnerability," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 31(1), pages 88-112, January.
    11. H. W. Corley, Jr. & Han Chang, 1974. "Finding the n Most Vital Nodes in a Flow Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 362-364, November.
    12. Bennett, Vivienne L. & Eaton, David J. & Church, Richard L., 1982. "Selecting sites for rural health workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 63-72, January.
    13. Timothy Matisziw & Alan Murray, 2009. "Area coverage maximization in service facility siting," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 175-189, June.
    14. Lawrence V. Snyder & Mark S. Daskin, 2005. "Reliability Models for Facility Location: The Expected Failure Cost Case," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 400-416, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghaffarinasab, Nader & Motallebzadeh, Alireza, 2018. "Hub interdiction problem variants: Models and metaheuristic solution algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 496-512.
    2. Bangjun Wang & Guoqiang Shen & Xingshen Wang & Yunwen Dong & Ziyu Li, 2024. "Hub-and-Spoke Network Optimization with Flow Delay Cost: The Case of Goods Delivery on Urban Logistics Networks in Eastern China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Dimitrov, Nedialko B. & Solow, Daniel & Szmerekovsky, Joseph & Guo, Jia, 2017. "Emergency relocation of items using single trips: Special cases of the Multiple Knapsack Assignment Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 938-942.
    4. Hyun Kim & Megan S. Ryerson, 2017. "The q-Ad Hoc Hub Location Problem for Multi-modal Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1015-1041, September.
    5. Nader Azad & Elkafi Hassini, 2019. "A Benders Decomposition Method for Designing Reliable Supply Chain Networks Accounting for Multimitigation Strategies and Demand Losses," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1287-1312, September.
    6. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O’Hanley, Jesse R. & Scaparra, M. Paola & García, Sergio, 2013. "Probability chains: A general linearization technique for modeling reliability in facility location and related problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 63-75.
    2. Ansari, Sina & Başdere, Mehmet & Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Smilowitz, Karen, 2018. "Advancements in continuous approximation models for logistics and transportation systems: 1996–2016," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 229-252.
    3. An, Shi & Cui, Na & Bai, Yun & Xie, Weijun & Chen, Mingliu & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2015. "Reliable emergency service facility location under facility disruption, en-route congestion and in-facility queuing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 199-216.
    4. Espejo, Inmaculada & Marín, Alfredo & Rodríguez-Chía, Antonio M., 2015. "Capacitated p-center problem with failure foresight," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 229-244.
    5. Trung Hieu Tran & Jesse R. O’Hanley & M. Paola Scaparra, 2017. "Reliable Hub Network Design: Formulation and Solution Techniques," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 358-375, February.
    6. Trung Hieu Tran & Thu Ba T. Nguyen, 2019. "Alternative-fuel station network design under impact of station failures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 279(1), pages 151-186, August.
    7. Robert Aboolian & Tingting Cui & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2013. "An Efficient Approach for Solving Reliable Facility Location Models," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 720-729, November.
    8. O'Hanley, Jesse R. & Church, Richard L., 2011. "Designing robust coverage networks to hedge against worst-case facility losses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(1), pages 23-36, February.
    9. Parajuli, Anubhuti & Kuzgunkaya, Onur & Vidyarthi, Navneet, 2017. "Responsive contingency planning of capacitated supply networks under disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 13-37.
    10. Weijun Xie & Yanfeng Ouyang & Sze Chun Wong, 2016. "Reliable Location-Routing Design Under Probabilistic Facility Disruptions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 1128-1138, August.
    11. Albareda-Sambola, Maria & Hinojosa, Yolanda & Puerto, Justo, 2015. "The reliable p-median problem with at-facility service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 656-666.
    12. Azad, Nader & Hassini, Elkafi, 2019. "Recovery strategies from major supply disruptions in single and multiple sourcing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 481-501.
    13. Yun Hui Lin & Yuan Wang & Loo Hay Lee & Ek Peng Chew, 2021. "Robust facility location with structural complexity and demand uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 485-507, June.
    14. An, Shi & Cui, Na & Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2013. "Location planning for transit-based evacuation under the risk of service disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-16.
    15. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Moghadam, Hani Shahmoradi, 2016. "Designing a supply chain resilient to major disruptions and supply/demand interruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 121-149.
    16. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Peng, Fan, 2013. "A supporting station model for reliable infrastructure location design under interdependent disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 80-93.
    17. Zhang, Ying & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Qi, Mingyao & Miao, Lixin, 2016. "A heterogeneous reliable location model with risk pooling under supply disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 151-178.
    18. Yun, Lifen & Qin, Yong & Fan, Hongqiang & Ji, Changxu & Li, Xiaopeng & Jia, Limin, 2015. "A reliability model for facility location design under imperfect information," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 596-615.
    19. Mengshi Lu & Lun Ran & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2015. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under Uncertain Correlated Disruptions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 445-455, October.
    20. Albareda-Sambola, Maria & Landete, Mercedes & Monge, Juan F. & Sainz-Pardo, José L., 2017. "Introducing capacities in the location of unreliable facilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 175-188.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Location analysis; System vulnerability; Integer linear programming; p-Median problem; Closest assignment; C61; C44;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:15:y:2013:i:4:p:491-512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.