IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jfamec/v37y2016i1p115-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Women’s Decision-Making Power Affect Budget Share, Nutrition and Education in Pakistan?

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohui Hou

Abstract

Understanding the effects of power distribution, particularly women’s decision making, on human development is important. This study used a set of direct measures of decision-making power from the Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement Survey and examined the relationship between women’s decision-making power and the food budget share, nutrition and child schooling. It found that in Pakistan, the relationship between women’s decision-making power and nutrition was not linear and varied depending on rural or urban residence. There was no clear evidence that higher women’s decision-making power would lead to better nutrition availability in Pakistan, but overall households were more likely to consume less grain and more vegetables. When women had higher decision-making power, children, particularly rural girls, were more likely to be enrolled in school. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohui Hou, 2016. "How Does Women’s Decision-Making Power Affect Budget Share, Nutrition and Education in Pakistan?," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 115-131, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jfamec:v:37:y:2016:i:1:p:115-131
    DOI: 10.1007/s10834-015-9439-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10834-015-9439-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10834-015-9439-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sevias Guvuriro & Frederik Booysen, 2021. "Family‐type public goods and intra‐household decision‐making by co‐resident South African couples," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 1629-1647, August.
    2. Abdul Hameed & Tariq Mahmood Ali & Muhammad Omar Najam, 2024. "The impact of unconditional cash transfers on enhancing household wellbeing in Pakistan: evidence from a quasi-experimental design," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Saleemi, Sundus & Kofol, Chiara, 2022. "Women’s participation in household decisions and gender equality in children’s education: Evidence from rural households in Pakistan," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    4. Swarn Chatterjee & Lu Fan & Soomin Ryu & Jinhee Kim, 2021. "A Decade Review of Asian Studies in the Journal of Family and Economic Issues from 2010 to 2019," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 178-194, July.
    5. Muhammad Tariq Majeed & Faiza Kiran, 2019. "Women’s decision making power and child labor: evidence from Pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 2175-2197, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Household bargaining; Women’s decision making power; Human development; Education; Nutrition; Islamic culture; Pakistan; D1; D7; I2;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D1 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior
    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jfamec:v:37:y:2016:i:1:p:115-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.