IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v198y2025i1d10.1007_s10551-024-05799-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Silenced by Incivility

Author

Listed:
  • Kristin Bain

    (Saunders College of Business, Rochester Institute of Technology)

  • Kathryn Coll

    (College of Business, University of Nevada Reno)

  • Tamar A. Kreps

    (Shidler College of Business, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa)

  • Elizabeth R. Tenney

    (David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah)

Abstract

Some theories suggest that women anticipate negative consequences (i.e., backlash) for counter-stereotypical actions and take steps to avoid those consequences. We propose that women may expect gender-based backlash for voicing, or contributing ideas that challenge the status quo, and thus engage in more silence (withholding those contributions) than men. However, we also propose that women anticipate gender backlash, and hence engage in more silence, only when other group members’ behavior signals that deviating from prescribed gender norms is risky. In two studies with over 3000 participants, we found that incivility increased women’s expectation that voicing would lead to gender backlash. In turn, women engaged in more silence than men in uncivil groups, but we found no gender difference in silence in civil groups. Our findings reveal that certain situations differentially alert people to interpersonal risks, thus influencing their decision to withhold contributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristin Bain & Kathryn Coll & Tamar A. Kreps & Elizabeth R. Tenney, 2025. "Silenced by Incivility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 107-125, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:198:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05799-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05799-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-024-05799-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-024-05799-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:198:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05799-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.