IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v197y2025i2d10.1007_s10551-024-05747-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Social Media Pressure Induce Corporate Hypocrisy? Evidence of ESG Greenwashing from China

Author

Listed:
  • Li Long

    (Hunan University Of Technology and Business)

  • Chunze Wang

    (Hunan University Of Technology and Business)

  • Min Zhang

    (Hunan University Of Technology and Business)

Abstract

Hypocrisy in corporate social responsibility has attracted increasing attention from scholars. Under the context of the digital era, we examine whether and how social media pressure affects the typical corporate hypocrisy of ESG greenwashing. Using a dataset of A-share listed firms in China from 2011 to 2021, we find that negative sentiment from stock message boards induces firms to engage in ESG greenwashing. Our results are confirmed by an array of robustness tests and additional tests. In addition, the impact of social media pressure is more pronounced in firms with lower market value and poorer reputation. The channel tests show that social media pressure induces ESG greenwashing by exacerbating managerial myopia. Finally, we further find that the shareholding of institutional investors, high-quality audit and local environmental regulation can alleviate this negative impact. Overall, our study demonstrates the mechanism underlying social media pressure on ESG greenwashing and provides practical suggestions for improving the construction of the ESG system.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Long & Chunze Wang & Min Zhang, 2025. "Does Social Media Pressure Induce Corporate Hypocrisy? Evidence of ESG Greenwashing from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 311-338, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:197:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05747-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05747-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-024-05747-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-024-05747-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:197:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05747-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.