IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v1y1998i1p61-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computers in the consulting room: a case study of clinician and patient perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn Aydin
  • James Anderson
  • Peter Rosen
  • Vincent Felitti
  • Hui‐Ching Weng

Abstract

Few clinicians in the United States use computers during patient encounters and many still worry that computers will depersonalize their interactions with patients. This case study describes patient and clinician reactions to a computer‐based health appraisal system. Findings showed no difference in any aspect of patient satisfaction between computer and non‐computer groups. Use of a computer in the consulting room neither depersonalized nor enhanced patient satisfaction. Clinicians (in this case, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) were willing to use the system, which they perceived as having benefits for patient care, but were concerned about the increased time required for exams, effort required to learn the system while still interacting appropriately with the patient, increased monitoring of their performance, and other organizational issues. Clinicians who used the system showed a higher tolerance for uncertainty and communicated more frequently with each other and with others throughout the department. Implementation was slowed by the need to demonstrate the monetary value of the system. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn Aydin & James Anderson & Peter Rosen & Vincent Felitti & Hui‐Ching Weng, 1998. "Computers in the consulting room: a case study of clinician and patient perspectives," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 61-74, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:1:y:1998:i:1:p:61-74
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1019021913951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1019021913951
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1019021913951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:1:y:1998:i:1:p:61-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.