IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v18y2015i2p156-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classifier calibration using splined empirical probabilities in clinical risk prediction

Author

Listed:
  • René Gaudoin
  • Giovanni Montana
  • Simon Jones
  • Paul Aylin
  • Alex Bottle

Abstract

The aims of supervised machine learning (ML) applications fall into three broad categories: classification, ranking, and calibration/probability estimation. Many ML methods and evaluation techniques relate to the first two. Nevertheless, there are many applications where having an accurate probability estimate is of great importance. Deriving accurate probabilities from the output of a ML method is therefore an active area of research, resulting in several methods to turn a ranking into class probability estimates. In this manuscript we present a method, splined empirical probabilities, based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) to complement existing algorithms such as isotonic regression. Unlike most other methods it works with a cumulative quantity, the ROC curve, and as such can be tagged onto an ROC analysis with minor effort. On a diverse set of measures of the quality of probability estimates (Hosmer-Lemeshow, Kullback-Leibler divergence, differences in the cumulative distribution function) using simulated and real health care data, our approach compares favourably with the standard calibration method, the pool adjacent violators algorithm used to perform isotonic regression. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • René Gaudoin & Giovanni Montana & Simon Jones & Paul Aylin & Alex Bottle, 2015. "Classifier calibration using splined empirical probabilities in clinical risk prediction," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 156-165, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:156-165
    DOI: 10.1007/s10729-014-9267-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10729-014-9267-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10729-014-9267-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:156-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.