IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/enreec/v88y2025i2d10.1007_s10640-024-00938-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Automation’s Impact on Ecological Footprint: Theory and Empirical Evidence from Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Shangze Dai

    (University of Florida)

Abstract

As technological advancements continue to unfold, automation has emerged as a pivotal force in reshaping both production paradigms and lifestyles. This paper introduces a comprehensive general equilibrium framework that encapsulates both automation and ecological environment. Through comparative static analysis, it seeks to elucidate the influence of automation on the environment. Furthermore, employing 32 European nations from 2000 to 2019 as samples, this research empirically investigates the propositions using panel least squares regression alongside panel threshold regression methods. In addition, this study employs predictions generated by an LSTM model using data from 1993 to 1999 as instrumental variables to address endogeneity. The findings reveal two opposing impacts of automation on the environment: the Leisure Effect, which worsens ecological degradation, and the Conservation Effect, which improves environmental quality. When environmental awareness is high, the Conservation Effect dominates, significantly reducing the ecological footprint. Moreover, as automation technology level advances, its capacity to curtail the ecological footprint intensifies. Specifically, from the perspective of the full sample, the addition of one robot per thousand workers leads to a 0.13 unit reduction in the natural logarithm of ecological footprint; meanwhile, the suppressive effect varies by approximately 3 to 10 times before and after reaching certain thresholds of environmental awareness and technological advancement behind automation. Subsequent grouped regression analysis further elucidates that within European contexts, automation’s footprint-reducing effects are predominantly observed in nations with GDP per capita below $20,000, advanced digitalization, lower environmental dependence, reduced military spending, and strong government intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Shangze Dai, 2025. "Understanding Automation’s Impact on Ecological Footprint: Theory and Empirical Evidence from Europe," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(2), pages 503-532, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:88:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-024-00938-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00938-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-024-00938-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10640-024-00938-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Robotic; Sustainable development; Environmental awareness; Technological progress;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:88:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-024-00938-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.