IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ejlwec/v59y2025i1d10.1007_s10657-024-09831-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cycles of decrees: evidence from the Italian Parliament

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Dattilo

    (University of Turin)

  • Fabio Padovano

    (Université de Rennes
    Università Roma Tre)

Abstract

We empirically test the predictions of the Political Legislation Cycle (PLC) theory about decrees using official disaggregated data about five types of decrees of the Italian legal system: law-decrees (decreti legge), legislative decrees (decreti legislativi), DPR (decrees of the President of the Republic), implementing decrees (decreti attuativi) and independent decrees (decreti indipendenti). The sample period includes the first 17 legislatures of the parliament of the Italian Republic. The estimates of the counts of decrees are conducted through a a multilevel negative binomial regression model—plus other estimating techniques adopted for robustness checks. The results broadly confirm the theory’s prediction that decrees tend to be approved in the earlier stages of the legislature or of the life of a government; this prediction receives stronger support the more the institutional characteristics of each type of decree resemble the theoretical variable. A battery of placebo and robustness checks confirms the result, showing the heuristic importance of combining the knowledge of specific legislative institutions coming from studies of constitutional law to the analytics provided by economics. The estimates also reveal that, while the government’s ideology has a limted impact on the production of decrees, the “legislative practices” of the single governments of the Italian Second Republic affect it in a more noticeable way. Finally, the analysis confirms the prediction of the PLC theory about the legislators’ choice of the legislative instruments through which they satisfy the conflicting interests of special interest groups and voters, shedding light on the timing of activity and the legislative preferences of lobbies.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Dattilo & Fabio Padovano, 2025. "The cycles of decrees: evidence from the Italian Parliament," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 133-178, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:59:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10657-024-09831-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10657-024-09831-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10657-024-09831-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10657-024-09831-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Political legislation cycles; Decrees; Special interest groups; Unorganized voters; Government ideology; Institutional analysis; Multilevel panel data; Deseasonalization; Variance decomposition; Negative binomial model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • C49 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Other
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H62 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Deficit; Surplus

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:59:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10657-024-09831-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.