IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ejlwec/v40y2015i2p367-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The design flaw of the displacement principle of clean development mechanism: the neglect of electricity shortage

Author

Listed:
  • Jinshan Zhu
  • Yingkai Tang

Abstract

This study addresses a methodology flaw of Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) that neglects the wide-spread electricity shortage in the developing countries. The impact of this neglect is huge: about half of the annual carbon credits from the projects registered by 2010 are from the on-grid electricity displacement projects, and the majority of them had concentrated in several countries where electricity shortage remains severe and lasting. In the context of widespread energy shortage, the extra electricity produced by the CDM projects is more likely to be used to provide extra electricity supply rather than substitute the Business-as-usual (BAU) electricity supply. Hence, the neglect of the wide-spread energy shortage in the CDM methods puts the integrity of a critical amount of the CDM carbon credit in question. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Jinshan Zhu & Yingkai Tang, 2015. "The design flaw of the displacement principle of clean development mechanism: the neglect of electricity shortage," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 367-391, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:40:y:2015:i:2:p:367-391
    DOI: 10.1007/s10657-012-9374-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10657-012-9374-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10657-012-9374-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeff Tollefson, 2008. "Carbon-trading market has uncertain future," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7187), pages 508-509, April.
    2. Zhu, Jinshan, 2012. "The Correlated Factors of the Uneven Performances of the CDM Countries," IEL Working Papers 11, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    3. Hermann E. Ott & Wolfgang Sterk & Rie Watanabe, 2008. "The Bali roadmap: new horizons for global climate policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 91-95, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinshan Zhu, 2017. "Assessing China’s price review policy on Clean Development Mechanism projects," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 285-316, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinshan Zhu & Hui Yao & Yingkai Tang & Liyong Wang, 2015. "An econometric analysis of sub-national Clean Development Mechanism performance in China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(7), pages 1137-1153, October.
    2. Jinshan Zhu, 2017. "Assessing China’s price review policy on Clean Development Mechanism projects," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 285-316, April.
    3. Stavros Afionis & Ioannis Chatzopoulos, 2010. "Russia’s role in UNFCCC negotiations since the exit of the United States in 2001," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 45-63, March.
    4. Flachsland, Christian & Marschinski, Robert & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2009. "Global trading versus linking: Architectures for international emissions trading," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1637-1647, May.
    5. Bongardt, Daniel & Rudolph, Frederic & Sterk, Wolfgang, 2009. "Transport in developing countries and climate policy: suggestions for a Copenhagen agreement and beyond," Wuppertal Papers 179, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    6. Sterk, Wolfgang & Arens, Christof & Beuermann, Christiane & Bongardt, Daniel & Borbonus, Sylvia & Dienst, Carmen & Eichhorst, Urda & Kiyar, Dagmar & Luhmann, Hans-Jochen & Ott, Hermann E. & Rudolph, F, 2009. "Towards an effective and equitable climate change agreement: A Wuppertal proposal for Copenhagen," Wuppertal Spezial, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, volume 40, number 40.
    7. Rob Dellink & Michel den Elzen & Harry Aiking & Emmy Bergsma & Frans Berkhout & Thijs Dekker & Joyeeta Gupta, 2009. "Sharing the Burden of Adaptation Financing: An Assessment of the Contributions of Countries," Working Papers 2009.59, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    8. Bobo Zheng & Jiuping Xu, 2014. "Carbon Capture and Storage Development Trends from a Techno-Paradigm Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    9. Koo, Bonsang, 2017. "Preparing hydropower projects for the post-Paris regime: An econometric analysis of the main drivers for registration in the Clean Development Mechanism," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 868-877.
    10. Ralf Schüle & Wolfgang Sterk, 2009. "Linking domestic emissions trading schemes and the evolution of the international climate regime bottom-up support of top-down processes? Introduction to the special issue of MITI," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 375-378, June.
    11. Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari & Frank Wijen & Barbara Gray, 2013. "Constructing a Climate Change Logic: An Institutional Perspective on the “Tragedy of the Commons”," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1014-1040, August.
    12. Ott, Hermann E. & Curtius, Hans & Maroulis, Georgios, 2008. "Möglichkeiten verstärkter Nord-Süd-Technologiekooperation im Klimaregime: Studie auf Grundlage einer Analyse für das Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit im Rahmen des Proje," Wuppertal Papers 174, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    13. Costantini, Valeria & Sforna, Giorgia & Zoli, Mariangela, 2016. "Interpreting bargaining strategies of developing countries in climate negotiations. A quantitative approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 128-139.
    14. Pelletier, Johanne & Kirby, Kathryn R. & Potvin, Catherine, 2012. "Significance of carbon stock uncertainties on emission reductions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 3-11.
    15. Xiaofang Deng & Junkui Li & Lijuan Su & Shan Zhao & Shaofei Jin, 2022. "Human Resource Allocation in the State-Owned Forest Farm of China for the Changing Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Trotter, Ian Michael & da Cunha, Dênis Antônio & Féres, José Gustavo, 2015. "The relationships between CDM project characteristics and CER market prices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 158-167.
    17. Elizabeth Stanton, 2011. "Negishi welfare weights in integrated assessment models: the mathematics of global inequality," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 417-432, August.
    18. Michael Grubb, 2008. "The Bali COP: Plus �a change..," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 3-6, January.
    19. Giorgia Sforna, 2019. "Climate change and developing countries: from background actors to protagonists of climate negotiations," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 273-295, June.
    20. Zongguo Wen & Xuan Zhang & Jining Chen & Qilu Tan & Xueying Zhang, 2014. "Forecasting Co2 Mitigation and Policy Options for China's Key Sectors in 2010–2030," Energy & Environment, , vol. 25(3-4), pages 635-659, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Carbon credits; Carbon emissions trading; Clean development mechanism (CDM); Q54; K32; K33;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:40:y:2015:i:2:p:367-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.