IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiaeu/v15y2017i2d10.1007_s10308-017-0474-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redistributing the EU-China economic relationship: the role of domestic change in China

Author

Listed:
  • Duncan Freeman

    (College of Europe)

Abstract

As the importance of China in the global economy has grown, changes in its domestic economy have increasing impact in the EU. However, a key factor is no longer the simple fact of China’s rise, but that its economy is undergoing rapid change through structural transition. Many scholars argue that the interaction of political and economic dimensions is a significant factor in the distribution of economic benefits of the EU’s relations with China among Member States. However, underlying these bilateral aspects of the relationship are domestic economic policies and structures both in the EU and China. In the future, domestic policy in China will have a greater effect in determining the structure of the bilateral economic relationship. These domestic policy dimensions outweigh any direct political intervention in the bilateral relationship. The increasing complexity resulting from structural change in China is likely to create redistribution in the relationship with the EU, notably among Member States. This “new normal” stage in China’s rise will create new winners and losers in the EU, with differentiated interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Duncan Freeman, 2017. "Redistributing the EU-China economic relationship: the role of domestic change in China," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 187-198, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:15:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10308-017-0474-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10308-017-0474-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10308-017-0474-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10308-017-0474-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fuchs, Andreas, 2016. "China’s Economic Diplomacy and the Politics-Trade Nexus," Working Papers 0609, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    2. Christian Dreger & Yun Schüler-Zhou & Margot Schüller, 2017. "Determinants of Chinese direct investments in the European Union," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(42), pages 4231-4240, September.
    3. Carol Glen & Richard Murgo, 2007. "EU-China relations: balancing political challenges with economic opportunities," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 331-344, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Turcsányi & Runya Qiaoan, 2020. "Friends or foes? How diverging views of communist past undermine the China-CEE ‘16+1 platform’," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 397-412, September.
    2. Adam A. Ambroziak & Joanna Stefaniak, 2022. "The position of China in trade in services within the European Union," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(2), pages 335-354, June.
    3. Thomas Christiansen & Richard Maher, 2017. "The rise of China—challenges and opportunities for the European Union," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 121-131, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lili Pan & Lin Wang & Qianqian Feng, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Risk Management in Foreign Direct Investment: Insights and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra & Anna Grosman & William L. Megginson, 2023. "A review of the internationalization of state-owned firms and sovereign wealth funds: Governments’ nonbusiness objectives and discreet power," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(1), pages 78-106, February.
    3. Knoerich, Jan & Vitting, Simon, 2021. "The distinct contribution of investment promotion agencies’ branch offices in bringing Chinese multinationals to Europe," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    4. Paul J.J. Welfens, 2016. "Qualitätswettbewerb, Produktinnovationen und Schumpetersche Prozesse in internationalen Märkten," EIIW Discussion paper disbei220, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    5. Dürr, Niklas S. & Rammer, Christian & Böing, Philipp, 2020. "Direktinvestitionen zwischen Deutschland und China aus einer innovationspolitischen Sicht: Studie im Auftrag der Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 8-2020, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    6. Junsong Wang & Yehua Dennis Wei & Bingquan Lin, 2021. "Functional division and location choices of Chinese outward FDI: The case of ICT firms," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 937-957, August.
    7. Pareja-Alcaraz, Pablo, 2017. "Chinese investments in Southern Europe's energy sectors: Similarities and divergences in China's strategies in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 700-710.
    8. Bas Hooijmaaijers, 2021. "A comparative analysis of the role of the state in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean investment in the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 427-444, December.
    9. Ruilin Yang & Harald Bathelt, 2022. "China's outward investment activity: Ambiguous findings in the literature and empirical trends in greenfield investments," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 313-341, March.
    10. Fascia, Michael, 2019. "Working Paper Series," OSF Preprints s7fg9, Center for Open Science.
    11. Adolfo Maza & Paula Gutiérrez-Portilla, 2022. "Outward FDI and exports relation: A heterogeneous panel approach dealing with cross-sectional dependence," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 170, pages 174-189.
    12. Ling Feng & Lulan Ge & Zhiyuan Li & Ching‐Yi Lin, 2022. "Financial development and natural resources: The dynamics of China’s outward FDI," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 739-762, March.
    13. Paul J.J. Welfens, 2016. "EU-Osterweiterung: Anpassungsprozesse, Binnenmarktdynamik und Euro-Perspektiven," EIIW Discussion paper disbei216, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    14. Ni Gao & Johannes Schaaper, 2018. "Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in France: Motivations and Management Style," Post-Print hal-03255216, HAL.
    15. Kenneth Chan, 2010. "Images, visibility and the prospects of soft power of the EU in Asia: the case of China," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 133-147, July.
    16. Andonova, Veneta & Losada-Otálora, Mauricio, 2020. "Understanding the interplay between brand and innovation orientation: Evidence from emerging multinationals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 540-552.
    17. Flora Rencz, 2023. "The determinants of Chinese foreign direct investment in the European Union," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 331-349, September.
    18. Mico Apostolov, 2017. "The impact of FDI on the performance and entrepreneurship of domestic firms," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 390-415, December.
    19. Wasseem Mina, 2017. "The Race to the Top: Institutional Clusters and World FDI Shares," Working Papers 1136, Economic Research Forum, revised 09 2003.
    20. Mohammad Razib Hossain, 2021. "Inward foreign direct investment in Bangladesh: Do we need to rethink about some of the macro-level quantitative determinants?," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:15:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10308-017-0474-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.