IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kab/journl/y2019i1p30-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bulgarian ERP market survey results – the accounting perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Iliyan Dimitrov

    (University of Economics, Varna, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Òhis article presents the results from our survey investigating peculiarities of financial accounting and management accounting within ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) systems. Two questionnaires are designed – for two target groups: ERP vendors and ERP users. The purpose of this article is the exploration of some strong and weak accounting sides of ERP systems, ERP capabilities to support financial accounting and management accounting within enterprises. The purpose is reached by comparing opinions of ERP vendors and ERP users from our survey. The results from the survey reveal that ERP users don’t reach some of the frequently advertised strong sides of ERP systems even after more than five years of usage. ERP vendors and ERP users have different position about the degree of facilitation and support (potential and really achieved) from ERP systems to financial accounting. ERP users don’t apply a broad variety of management accounting tools by ERP systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Iliyan Dimitrov, 2019. "Bulgarian ERP market survey results – the accounting perspective," Economics and computer science, Publishing house "Knowledge and business" Varna, issue 1, pages 30-37.
    • Handle: RePEc:kab:journl:y:2019:i:1:p:30-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eknigibg.net/Volume5/Issue1/spisanie-br1-2019_pp.30-37.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian Vasilev (ed.), 2017. "Second conference on innovative teaching methods (ITM 2017)," Digitization, big data, artificial intelligence, Publishing house "Science and Economics" Varna, number 23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kab:journl:y:2019:i:1:p:30-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Julian Vasilev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kbvarbg.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.