IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jso/coejss/v4y2015i1p705-725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The discount framing in different pricing schemes: Combined versus partitioned pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Lee

    (International Academy of Management, Hong Kong)

  • Dr. Frankie Law

    (IEM, Fudan University, Shanghai, China)

Abstract

Pricing is one of the most sophisticated and critical issues which managers have to face. It is obvious that managers have been undervaluing the behavioural and psychological perspective of pricing for many years. With a clear understanding of behavioural pricing, managers are able to make extra profit for their firms. In the current study, it was interesting to investigating exactly how manipulation of discounts in the combined pricing scheme and partitioned pricing scheme affects the purchase decisions of consumers, such as consumers’ purchase intentions, value perceptions and motivation to purchase. In the experiment of this paper, the four scenarios were based on different pricing schemes and price discount framing, namely Combined/Non-discounted condition, Combined/Discounted condition, Partitioned/Non-discounted condition and Partitioned/Discounted condition. The ultimate goal of this study is to provide further insight for managers so as they can identify and understand consumers’ reactions from psychological and behavioural perspectives under different pricing schemes, as well as how consumers frame price discount in order to ethically capture additional profit from their businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Lee & Dr. Frankie Law, 2015. "The discount framing in different pricing schemes: Combined versus partitioned pricing," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 4(1), pages :705-725, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:jso:coejss:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:705-725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://centreofexcellence.net/J/JSS/Vol4/No1/JSSarticle11,4%281%29pp705-725.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jso:coejss:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:705-725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: COES&RJ LLC. Maintainer-Workplace-Name: Centre of Excellence for Scientific & Research Journalism - COES&RJ LLC Maintainer-Address: 10685-B Hazelhurst Dr., Houston, TX 77043, USA or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.