IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jns/jbstat/v243y2023i5p567-583n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green SÖP Extended: The Socio-Ecological Panel Surveys 2020 and 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Frondel Manuel

    (RWI – Leibniz-Institute for Economic Research, Essen, Germany)

  • Matejko Leonie

    (RWI – Leibniz-Institute for Economic Research, Essen, Germany)

  • Osberghaus Daniel

    (ZEW – Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany)

  • Sommer Stephan

    (RWI – Leibniz-Institute for Economic Research, Essen, Germany)

  • Vance Colin

    (RWI – Leibniz-Institute for Economic Research, Essen, Germany)

Abstract

The proliferation of instruments targeted at combatting climate change necessitates evidence-based evaluation to identify strategies that are not only effective and cost-efficient, but also supported by the population. In Germany, the data needed to support such analysis is scarce, however. A rare exception is Green SÖP, a panel data set that was established within the project Eval-MAP funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Green SÖP encompasses household data collected by the survey institute forsa over four years, spanning 2012–2015. The BMBF-funded project Eval-MAP 2 extended the Green SÖP panel data set by two additional surveys conducted in 2020 and 2022, covering both mitigation and adaptation behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Frondel Manuel & Matejko Leonie & Osberghaus Daniel & Sommer Stephan & Vance Colin, 2023. "Green SÖP Extended: The Socio-Ecological Panel Surveys 2020 and 2022," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 243(5), pages 567-583, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:243:y:2023:i:5:p:567-583:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/jbnst-2023-0030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2023-0030
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbnst-2023-0030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frondel, Manuel & Kussel, Gerhard & Larysch, Tobias & Osberghaus, Daniel, 2020. "Klimapolitik während der Corona-Pandemie: Ergebnisse einer Haushaltserhebung," RWI Materialien 136, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    2. Osberghaus, Daniel, 2022. "Versicherung von Hochwasserschäden klimasicher und sozial verträglich gestalten," ZEW policy briefs 2/2022, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Kussel, Gerhard & Larysch, Tobias, 2017. "Sozial-Ökologisches Panel: Datenbeschreibung der Haushaltsbefragung," RWI Materialien 110, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    4. Andor, Mark A. & Osberghaus, Daniel & Simora, Michael, 2020. "Natural Disasters and Governmental Aid: Is there a Charity Hazard?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Edenhofer Ottmar & Kalkuhl Matthias & Ockenfels Axel, 2020. "Das Klimaschutzprogramm der Bundesregierung: Eine Wende der deutschen Klimapolitik?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 4-18, April.
    6. Frondel, Manuel & Simora, Michael & Sommer, Stephan, 2017. "Risk Perception of Climate Change: Empirical Evidence for Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 173-183.
    7. Hubertus Bardt & Thilo Schaefer & Manuel Frondel & Manfred Fischedick & Stefan Thomas & Marc Oliver Bettzüge & Oliver Hennes, 2019. "Instrumente der Klimapolitik: effiziente Steuerung oder verfehlte Staatseingriffe? [Instruments of Climate Policy: Efficient Management or Failed State Intervention?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 99(3), pages 163-180, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klick Larissa & Kussel Gerhard & Sommer Stephan, 2021. "Green-SÖP: The Socio-ecological Panel Survey: 2012–2016," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 241(3), pages 405-414, June.
    2. Gagliarducci, Stefano & Paserman, M. Daniele & Patacchini, Eleonora, 2019. "Hurricanes, Climate Change Policies and Electoral Accountability," IZA Discussion Papers 12334, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Lars Mewes & Leonie Tuitjer & Peter Dirksmeier, 2024. "Exploring the variances of climate change opinions in Germany at a fine-grained local scale," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Peter John Robinson & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Fujin Zhou, 2021. "An experimental study of charity hazard: The effect of risky and ambiguous government compensation on flood insurance demand," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 275-318, December.
    5. Donatella Baiardi, 2021. "What do you think about climate change?," Working Papers 477, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2021.
    6. Hänsel, Martin C. & Franks, Max & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2022. "Optimal carbon taxation and horizontal equity: A welfare-theoretic approach with application to German household data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Tesselaar, Max & Botzen, W.J. Wouter & Robinson, Peter J. & Aerts, Jeroen C.J.H. & Zhou, Fujin, 2022. "Charity hazard and the flood insurance protection gap: An EU scale assessment under climate change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Tim Philippi & Jörg Schiller, 2024. "Abandoning disaster relief and stimulating insurance demand through premium subsidies," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 91(2), pages 339-382, June.
    9. Osberghaus, Daniel & Reif, Christiane, 2021. "How do different compensation schemes and loss experience affect insurance decisions? Experimental evidence from two independent and heterogeneous samples," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Baiardi, Donatella & Morana, Claudio, 2021. "Climate change awareness: Empirical evidence for the European Union," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Hasibuan, Abdul Muis & Gregg, Daniel & Stringer, Randy, 2020. "Accounting for diverse risk attitudes in measures of risk perceptions: A case study of climate change risk for small-scale citrus farmers in Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Sommer, Stephan & Mattauch, Linus & Pahle, Michael, 2022. "Supporting carbon taxes: The role of fairness," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    13. Thomas Husted & David Nickerson, 2021. "Private Support for Public Disaster Aid," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Selim Jürgen Ergun & Zehra D. Karadeniz & M. Fernanda Rivas, 2024. "Climate change risk perception in Europe: country-level factors and gender differences," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Andor, Mark A. & Osberghaus, Daniel & Simora, Michael, 2020. "Natural Disasters and Governmental Aid: Is there a Charity Hazard?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Fluhrer, Svenja, 2023. "Crowding-in or crowding-out: The effect of humanitarian aid on households’ investments in climate adaptation," MPRA Paper 117975, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Mensah, Edouard R. & Filipski, Mateusz J., 2022. "Saving for a rainy day: the impact of natural disasters on savings rates," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322266, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Galina Hale, 2024. "Climate Disasters and Exchange Rates: Are Beliefs Keeping up with Climate Change?," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 72(1), pages 253-291, March.
    19. Knollenborg, Leonard & Sommer, Stephan, 2021. "Diverging beliefs on climate change and climate policy in Germany: The role of political orientations," Ruhr Economic Papers 909, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    20. Lloyd S. Davis & Bienvenido León & Michael J. Bourk & Lei Zhu & Wiebke Finkler, 2022. "Infotainment May Increase Engagement with Science but It Can Decrease Perceptions of Seriousness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    adaptation; climate policy; household panel;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q3 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q4 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:243:y:2023:i:5:p:567-583:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.