IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jns/jbstat/v233y2013i3p389-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relevance of Census Results for a Modern Society

Author

Listed:
  • Egeler Roderich

    (Statistisches Bundesamt, 65180 Wiesbaden, Germany)

  • Dinsenbacher Natalie

    (Statistisches Bundesamt, 65180 Wiesbaden, Germany)

  • Kleber Birgit

    (Statistisches Bundesamt, 65180 Wiesbaden, Germany)

Abstract

Population censuses have been conducted for thousands of years and they are one of the bases of any official statistics. By giving a detailed overview of the structure of a country’s population at a specific point in time, they provide one of the most important parameters for political action. In addition, in modern statistical systems, population censuses are the data basis for a variety of further statistical information, such as intercensal updates of the number of inhabitants. They provide the basis for the statistical fields which either describe the population or in which population data are integrated. Furthermore they allow drawing reliable population samples and performing qualified extrapolation of sample results. This article focuses on the relevance of censuses in general and, more specifically, of the current 2011 Census in Germany. Following a historical overview in the first part of the article, the second part describes the various definitions of “population”, the relevance and issues of defining the survey unit and of operationalising concepts of variables. In the third part, some examples illustrate various areas that are relevant for statistics and social policy and for which the 2011 Census will provide information, while the fourth part provides an outlook on how the census can be developed further, both in terms of methodology and contents.

Suggested Citation

  • Egeler Roderich & Dinsenbacher Natalie & Kleber Birgit, 2013. "The Relevance of Census Results for a Modern Society," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 233(3), pages 389-405, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:233:y:2013:i:3:p:389-405
    DOI: 10.1515/jbnst-2013-0307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2013-0307
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbnst-2013-0307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roderich Egeler & Thomas Wöll & Markus Zwick, 2012. "Perspektiven für die amtliche Statistik," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 5(4), pages 269-284, March.
    2. Gabriele Rolf & Markus Zwick & Gert G. Wagner, 2008. "Fortschritte und Herausforderungen der informationellen Infrastruktur in Deutschland," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 128(4), pages 631-646.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gert G. Wagner, 2015. "Anfänge der amtlichen Statistik und der Sozialberichterstattung: die "politische" Arithmetik," RatSWD Working Papers 244, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    2. Franz Wolfgang & Winker Peter, 2013. "Guest Editorial," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 233(3), pages 260-265, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roderich Egeler & Thomas Wöll & Markus Zwick, 2012. "Perspektiven für die amtliche Statistik," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 5(4), pages 269-284, March.
    2. Patricia Eilsberger & Markus Zwick, 2011. "Geschlechterspezifische Einkommensunterschiede bei Selbständigen als Freiberufler und Gewerbetreibende im Vergleich zu abhängig Beschäftigten – Ein empirischer Vergleich auf der Grundlage steuerstatis," FFB-Discussionpaper 93, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)), LEUPHANA University Lüneburg.
    3. Peter Lippe, 2013. "Die „Frankfurter Schule“ in der Statistik und ihre Folgen," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 7(1), pages 71-89, August.
    4. Ute Hanefeld & Jürgen Schupp, 2008. "The First Six Waves of SOEP: The Panel Project in the Years 1983 to 1989," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 146, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    5. Willand, Ilka & Stirner, Heidrun, 2022. "Von der Verbreitung zur Kommunikation," WISTA – Wirtschaft und Statistik, Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), Wiesbaden, vol. 74(6), pages 38-43.
    6. Vorgrimler, Daniel & Zwick, Markus, 2022. "Ein Blick auf die ehemalige Präsidentin und die ehemaligen Präsidenten des Statistischen Bundesamtes," WISTA – Wirtschaft und Statistik, Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), Wiesbaden, vol. 74(6), pages 15-26.
    7. Mirko Felchner, 2015. "Einkommensdynamik bei Selbständigen als Freie Berufe und abhängig Beschäftigte Eine dynamische Paneldatenschätzung mit Daten des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels," FFB-Discussionpaper 101, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)), LEUPHANA University Lüneburg.
    8. Ute Hanefeld & Jürgen Schupp, 2008. "Die ersten sechs Wellen des SOEP: das Panelprojekt in den ersten Jahren 1983-1989," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(3), pages 27-42.
    9. Timo Schmid & Markus Zwick, 2022. "Vorwort der Herausgeber [Foreword of the editors]," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 16(2), pages 89-96, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:233:y:2013:i:3:p:389-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.